Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 0 |
Putting aside the fact that this obviously isn't the most serious debate in the world for a moment, let's discuss the issue in a little bit of depth. I would normally side with the True argument for this debate, but the problem is that the rancher analogy simply doesn't fit. If a rancher isn't doing his job satisfactorily, it's not as if the cows can just kick him off his high tractor. Okay, well, maybe they could... But they certainly couldn't elect the NEW rancher(s).
But I do agree that the government has a certain responsibility to its constituents to supply some basic needs when the constituents are unable to supply themselves. That's what government's for: to help the tax payer when they need it.
|