Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 161 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 86% |
Arguments: | 135 |
Debates: | 9 |
History has shown that no single nation, or league of nations, can take the world for itself.
Although the age of great European empires taking the rest of the world would be more interesting than what we have today, nations shouldn't have their freedom to govern taken simply because another is stronger.
Also, the desire t become an empire has caused wars between imperial powers of epic scale, such as the WWI.
every single major problem has improved since he took office
Once again you present no evidence of your argument, It seems you make up "facts" as fast as Obama himself.
How does it feel knowing that your grand kids are going to look at the tea party types someday and laugh at how blatantly delusional they were?
My grandparents will be too bust laughing at your hair.
You'll be a pretty funny joke
Maybe, but for now republicans have the majority.
I still like my "giant nuclear turbo laser wall of utter death and authority" idea better.
Obama is a victim of his own inexperience, lies, and overall stupidity.
china can produce numbers, but the gulf wars proved that numbers are useless without quality.
Adding to that, they would never get to North America or Europe because they lack the naval or air power. a war with China would be quick and easy because bombing raids, missles, etc. would cause severe civilian casualties with their over-crowded cities.
Yes, but this applies to todays liberals, if you were in, say, the early 1800's and a liberal you would stand for democracy, separation of church and state, etc.
But i do agree with you that their thinking is somewhat backwards.
|