Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day



Welcome to Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day!

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Vwruebvuibrw

Reward Points:15
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
68%
Arguments:13
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
0 points

"Why is it that there is so much resistance to gay marriage?"

1. the concept of gay marriage is just a mockery of the institution. it's like celebrating you're retarded. when a child burns it's fingers on a hot stove, do we celebrate that? do we teach the child to do it again or do we do the exact opposite? teaching the child to get burnt over and over again would be a mockery of parenting. in the same way gay marriage is a mockery.

2. homosexuality is a choice. it is a choice in the same sense that smoking, eating junk food or alcoholism is a choice. some people are prone to be that way. anyone that claims it isn't a choice in this sense is de facto claiming that epigenetics isn't science. we're basically being taught to admire alcoholics/smokers/obese people/gay people. shouldn't the opposite be the case? shouldn't we admire people that choose not to drink/smoke/be fat/be gay even though they're prone to be that way? some people start smoking/drinking/eating junk food very young. one could argue they were born that way...

3. gay people are promiscuous. this is a result of it being a choice. promiscuous people shouldn't get married.

4. marriage is an option, not an obligation. this is true for everyone. if you aren't fit for marriage, don't get married. it's not mandatory!!! similarly, if you buy a car just so you don't have to be ashamed for not having it, you're doing the wrong thing that won't make you happy!

5. marriage is not a human right. human rights are access to water, food, medicine, etc. all very basic stuff. it is not access to cock or ass. even fucking electricity isn't a human right. it's a commodity.

6. gay males make up 1-3% of the public and yet they transmit over 2/3 of all new hiv infections (only sexually transmitted included). - source: www.cdc.gov now, how does this happen if they aren't promiscuous?

7. 1 out of 3 gay men has a wife and children. isn't that another proof that it's a choice? don't give me that crap about this being peer pressure. nobody gets married to a person of the sex they aren't attracted to because of society and peer pressure.

8. even if gays are married does that stop them from having sex-partners outside marriage? no. but they most likely won't get a divorce because there's nothing to be faithful about. according to some statistics an average gay relationship lasts about 18 months while both partners have sex with an average of 8 other people.

9. marriage aka matrimony is a word that means mother's office (mater+munus). just like the pope has an office (the papacy) and the us president has the oval office, a woman has an office and it's called marriage. this implies that the woman has a job which is creating the next generation. mocking her office by having two fags married is like having a member of the pussy riot take the office of the pope or having a member of al qaeda take the oval office. what kind of a monumental moron would you have to be not to have a problem with that?

10. marriage isn't about celebrating love. that's what relationships are for. marriage celebrates the (most likely) coming of the next generation. getting married knowing you will not have children is a mockery and should be sanctioned.

11. gays use a spectrum to define or explain their sexual orientation. they convinced themselves that they are born gay even though they began being attracted to same sex at age 6, for example. they're either lying to themselves or they're born aged 6.

12. not even adults in their 40s (especially lesbians) are sure about their sexual orientation. why? because it's a choice. how can a woman that had a dozen boyfriends switch to girls in her late 20s and realize that she was born a lesbian?

13. ellen degenerate switched to girls. she was having sex for years with a mentally unfit woman named anne hecke which is rape in my book. she is now in married to another switcher that gave up on men. if portia wasn't born gay than ellen is gay raping her. if she was, her husband straight raped her in the past.

14. the gays don't want marriage. most of gay movement leaders aren't gay at all. they're agents payed to reach certain goals. they gather activists like feminists, politicians, bloggers, tv faces, actors, musicians, teenagers, vegans, etc to push for their ideals because it's against hate and discrimination while it promotes what's right and just. who would be against that, right?

"Could it be that straight people feel like they are being manipulated or is it that they're all homophobes? They can't all be homophobes. Not in this day and age. They can't all be biggots, not in this day and age."

idiotic dilemma, bub. i am a homophobe and i'm proud of it. you see, i'm defending the society, the country, the world i grew up in. you're the attacker and yes, i do feel right to defend it with all my might. there cannot be a feeling more right than this. not doing anything would be worse than taking my own life.

"And yet, if they feel they are being manipulated, which arguments make them feel that way? If they feel manipulated by a particular argument for gay marriage, maybe we can stop using that argument."

gays have no valid arguments. for fuck's sake 30 years ago the gay movement protested marriage (heterosexual, of course) because they saw it as a form of imprisonment. they did so probably because they had no idea what it's about. the wife traditionally became "property" of the husband and even loses her last name. of course, these are just relics of the past. no one treats wives like livestock. people don't trade them. but that doesn't stop the fags from protesting. it would be easier to explain these simple facts to a martian. how can there be people that don't understand these things? it's this colossal disproportion of what is so well known to people that it needs no explanation on one side and idiots, provocateurs and plain fascists for whom no explanation is good enough on the other that is dividing society further and further.

"For example:

When I hear someone claim that the term marriage is superior to the term civil union, my perception is that that the person believes that other people will not accept civil unions on their own volition and that, therefore, the people's perceptions must be manipulated."

you're asking the people to accept this wonderful new idea that a mexican peso is worth the same as the american dollar. it is you who have to prove that your idea is better than the old one and it can then get implemented. the gays did none of these this. they know if they did all of their propaganda would fall apart. all they do is lobby and push for legislation that aren't backed by anything scientific and there is absolutely no scientific debate about any of the "issues".

"One way to manipulate people's perception of a thing is to associate the thing with something people perceive as positive. If you want the reverse response, you associated it with something people perceive as being negative, like Hitler and Nazis."

this is exactly what the fags are doing. a rainbow is a symbol of god's covenant with man, one of the most positive symbols in judeo-christian world. what did the fags do? they took it and put it on everything they have. today no one associates rainbows with anything other than fags. it's difficult not to hate these bastards and i'm not even religious!

"A concept like gay marriage needs to be able to stand on its own merit. Without any need to associate it with anything. It is its own concept. Unique. People must see it for what it is and accept as such."

a concept first has to go through stages of development. it can't become reality overnight unless you want it to fail. people do accept it as a concept but they don't accept the push for equating marriage and the homosexual "marriage". the name cannot be the same.

"People must not be forced into viewing it through rose color glasses (or glasses of any color). In other words, the other side shouldn't associate gay marriage with something negative in order to discredit it."

people are forced to accept it. a million people in paris protesting gay marriage and no one twitched. i explained on the top why gay marriage is a complete waste of everyone's time.

"The problem with trying to manipulate people is that people are not stupid. They know when they are being manipulated and they push back. That is what I see happening right now with gay marriage. Which is why I advocate not pursuing that tactic (to both sides)."

people are stupid but they have instincts and they are rarely wrong.

Vwruebvuibrw has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here