There's no need for long winded, drawn out, explanations, well thought out reasons backed by logic, and supporting evidence. Just tell the other person that they are wrong and be done with it. If you feel that you need to add something more, call them an idiot.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
You are wrong, and an idiot. :)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
I have aeen many people use that argument against you many times. I glad you are finally embrasing it ;)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
All those people were wrong idiots though.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
There is only one person who is ever right on this site and that person is the one typing the argument. ;)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Except when you type it because you are wrong and an idiot.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
See, you were right when you were typing but now I am right.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
No, you are wrong and an idiot.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Don't you have a baby to feed or something? Go change his diaper.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
You are wrong and an idiot. Clearly you don't think I am wrong because you didn't tell me I was.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
I am more subtle than that. I just imply your wrongness and then take away whatever sting remains with a smiley ;)
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
When will you start implying I am wrong?
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Well..., I am not going to say that you are wrong but.... you're not right.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Wow, you are an idiot and a coward.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Why? Because I'm going easy on you and taking the high road?
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Why?
Because you said that was all I needed to say. The fact that you asked why proves you don't believe your own bullshit.
Because I'm going easy on you and taking the high road?
Losing isn't the high road.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
Losing? I did not know we were in a competition.
Believe my own bullshit? What bullshit? This joke debate? You took it seriously? And turned it into a competition? WTF?
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
Losing? I did not know we were in a competition.
That would explain why you are losing so badly.
Believe my own bullshit?
Shocking right? You don't believe your troll bullshit. I don't blame you.
What bullshit?
You know, pretty much everything you write. Why are you shocked that someone would call your joke debate bullshit?
You took it seriously?
Nope. That's the greatest part.
And turned it into a competition?
No, it is only a competition when both sides show up. I turned it into a beating.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
;) You are a giant in your own mind.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
It's a valid argument. But it's not very compelling. ....................................... ..............................
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
Yes, it is. It is very compeling.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
I disagree.
And the power of my disagreement compels you. ......................................
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
You're right. The power of your argument compeled me to disagree. ;)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
More a statement than an argument, really.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
No it doesn't and that's final, period!
You gotta add some sauce at the end.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
I like it. You now have a hammer. Now go out there and treat every argument as a nail ;)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
no it doesn't. if someone says something white is white simply disagreeing is not a valid argument lol because its a lie.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
It constitutes an argument sure, but not necessarily a valid one.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
I disagree. See how that works ;)
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
You are wrong and an idiot.
7 years ago Side: Yes, it does.
So, for instance, all that would have been necessary was to tell Hitler that he was wrong and an idiot. What a lot of death and destruction that approach would have avoided. If only someone had thought of that 70 odd years ago.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.
Wrong conclusion. How many times have you prevented calamity from humanity simply by the power of your argument? If not you, then who? Jesus tried and look where that got him. Forget about humanity, how often have you changed a single person's mind about anythi g on this site? If the answer is, not often, then a simple, short, negating argument is good enough.
7 years ago Side: No, it doesn't.