Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

Debate Score:32
Arguments:20
Total Votes:38
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (20)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40131) pic



What is more important than Global Warming?

Click on the following link and read it before answering.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/sendler.asp

There recently was a death of a 98 year old lady named Irena.

During WWII, Irena got permission to work in the Warsaw Ghetto as a Plumbing/Sewer specialist.

She had an ulterior motive...

She KNEW what the Nazi's plans were for the Jews, (being German).

Irena smuggled infants out in the bottom of her tool box she carried, and she carried in the back of her truck a Burlap sack, (for larger kids).

She also had a dog in the back, that she trained to bark when the Nazi soldiers let her in and out of the ghetto.  The soldiers of course wanted nothing to do with the dog, and the barking covered the kids/infants noises.

During her time and course of doing this, she managed to smuggle out and save 2500 kids/infants.

She was caught, and the Nazi's broke both her legs, and arms, and beat her severely.

Irena kept a record of the names of all the kids she smuggled out, and kept them in a glass jar, buried under a tree in her back yard.

After the war, she tried to locate any parents that may have survived it, and reunited the family.  Most, of course, had been gassed.  Those kids she helped got placed into foster family homes, or adopted.

Last year Irena was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize....

She LOST.

Al Gore won, for doing a slide show on Global Warming.  Apparently nothing is more important than global warming.

 

Add New Argument

I'm starting to believe that global warming is caused by all the people out there getting all fired up. Me included.

2 points

I'd like to think outside the box that someone was bribed to pick Gore. Global warming deserves a "peace" award vs. a woman that went out of her way to save 2,000 children? Is the majority of the world really that selfish? Who picks the winner for nobel peace prize anyway?

Side: what the hell

Probably a bunch of liberals trying to push the liberal agenda. ;)

Side: what the hell
1 point

WHAT THE HELL

I think I'm going to break Al Gores legs and arms and beat him severely.

Side: what the hell
iamdavidh(4816) Disputed
1 point

I'm amazed at the amount of hatred you conservatives have toward a guy who hasn't done anything accept bring science that's been around for a decade to public attention.

It's like a little kid getting mad at his parents for telling him there's no such thing as Santa Clause.

How dare he talk about science like, like, LIKE IT'S SCIENCE OR SOMETHING!

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
zaetz(9) Disputed
2 points

Actually there is a lot of lies in Al Gore's statements that are detrimental to science...

I know several University Geology Professors (who is a liberal) who love to mention how they would love to point out to Al Gore all the lies he has told...

He works at this University - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p37f38rQ1Xs

Gore's slide show which is also full of lies is somehow more important then the saving of tens of thousands of children from being burned alive!?!??!?!?!? I can't believe to what length his groupies will go to defend him... Not that Global Warming isn't real its just that the man you protect is a not a good person...

Also there is this and I actually don't know what to say about it since I hate Bush but...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp

Practicing what you preach is usually nice... and both of them fail...

P.S. I have never voted for a conservative, I have voted for democrats... so please don't refer to me as a conservative...

Side: what the hell
JakeJ(3255) Disputed
1 point

As you can see conservatives aren't the only ones against Al Gore, allot of very smart people are.

Do you not think it ridiculous that guy who hasn't done anything accept bring science that's been around for a decade to public attention got the Nobel peace prize instead of a woman who has saved 2500 of lives!?

Side: what the hell
1 point

It's not just science. It's an inconvenient truth...for conservatives!

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
Cerin(206) Disputed
1 point

Yeah, that'll teach the Nobel Prize board for ignoring a woman who saved infants. Are you a psychopath?

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
1 point

I don't know what goes into the voting process. But I'm guessing proximity on a timeline had something to do with the vote, and not some evil liberal plot.

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
ThePyg(6706) Disputed
3 points

so because she did it a long time ago... Al Gore deserves it more?

If i were a judge, i'd look at the prize as LONG overdue.

it was a politically correct thing to do. no one worries that much about the holocaust anymore. they only feel sad about it when they watch movies about it and stuff, but Global Warming. Yeah, cause that's a current event (Global Freezing is old news now).

Side: what the hell
1 point

Lies! It's always scheming liberals! They're always plotting the downfall of the American public with their 'socialist' ways.

Hahaha, but no davidh has a point, it probably has something to do with the fact that i twas a long time ago. Not that people shouldn't get their dues, it's just if you keep looking back it's kind of hard to focus on tomorrow.

Side: Al Gore's a good guy

What about the Miss California didn't get the Miss America crown because she's going to marry a guy? ;)

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
1 point

I'd like to find a topic to discuss the Miss America, but this is the wrong topic for that.

Side: Al Gore's a good guy
1 point

I could understand if he single-handedly did the research and came up with the conclusions on his own, but he only made a documentary for it. This woman risked her life and health to save others from war. If this is undeserving of a peace prize, then I don't know what is.

Side: what the hell
0 points

This is a lame debate. If it went the other way, you could complain that someone who helped raise awareness for something that effects billions of people lost to someone who only helped a few thousand. Can't we agree they've both done good things?

Side: Al Gore's a good guy

Maybe I should get a Nobel Prize for raising awareness for something that effects billions of people.

If you're light skin, wear sun screen inorder to protect your skin from the sun or you'll get skin cancer.

Don't smoke, You'll get lung cancer.

There. Now how long before I get my Nobel Prize?

Side: Al Gore's a good guy