Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Kalamazoo's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Kalamazoo's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Even the most obtuse observer, will, after just a glimpse of the male and female human anatomy and after the ensuing analysis of ''the naughty bits'', be able to figure out the natural order of things. Throughout almost all the animal kingdom it is the mother's maternal and protective instincts which ensures the survival of it's offspring. The intrinsic bond between mother and child is an inherent characteristic of this relationship. Tens of thousands of reports give accounts of even the toughest,wounded and dying soldiers crying out for their mothers. I've never heard of anyone in a near to death situation, call out, oh where is my deviant sexually oriented father? Gay males have every right to live together just as much as heterosexual couples have. Gay couples make this choice as mature adults. It is however, wholly wrong to involve a baby or child in a selfish and mercenary attempt to enhance what is an unnatural relationship.

1 point

No. The natural state of a family unit consists of a mother and a father. Ideally the child/children, would be reared by their real parents, but not necessarily so. Both genders provide different, but equally essential needs for the child, and growing up in a manner which nature intended will be significantly more likely to produce a well balanced, confident adult. Whilst rearing a child may satisfy the deviant desires of the two males it will eventually fester into a living nightmare for the child. The boy will be more likely to feel insecure, freakish and will have to withstand, or buckle under the inevitable ''slings and arrow'', jibes from his peers during their school years and beyond. This wholly unnatural situation is completely denying the rights and welfare of the child and the motives of any proponent of this abnormal, if not perverted state should be viewed with extreme scepticism.

1 point

No. The natural state of a family unit consists of a mother and a father. Ideally the child/children, would be reared by their real parents, but not necessarily so. Both genders provide different, but equally essential needs for the child, and growing up in a manner which nature intended will be significantly more likely to produce a well balanced, confident adult. Whilst rearing a child may satisfy the deviant desires of the two males it will eventually fester into a living nightmare for the child. The boy will be more likely to feel insecure, freakish and will have to withstand, or buckle under the inevitable ''slings and arrow'', jibes from his peers during their school years and beyond. This wholly unnatural situation is completely denying the rights and welfare of the child and the motives of any proponent of this abnormal, if not perverted state should be viewed with extreme scepticism.


2 of 2 Pages: << Prev

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]