If a group of people are acting like a bunch of Nazis, don't be shy, let them know.
For example, ISIS (or ISIL, whatever you want to call them) could be considered Nazis except they are not white and they are killing their own kind so they're one level below that.
True.
Side Score: 11
|
Wait..., what? No!!!
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
Like the Germans of that awful period, they have a grand plan of making the world succumb to the doctrine of Allah. Their clever strategy includes the ''appropriation'' of non Islamic states by swamping these liberally run nations with Muslim immigrants, many of whom, as we have witnessed to our bloody and deadly cost, are ''sleepers'' awaiting for their I.S. leaders to issue the orders for them to carry out another atrocity on the civilians in whose midst they live. Only today in has been revealed that Jihad John's parents lived in Britain for twenty years on state benefits which cost the taxpayer £400K. They were so called asylum seekers from Kuwait to where they have now returned safe and sound, and, wait for it, are still receiving handouts from the British taxpayer. You really couldn't make it up. The weak leaders of the West have been paralysed by fear and have yet to decide how to effectively react to the psychopathic Muslim death squads and how to deal with the ticking time bomb which the millions of Muslims represent throughout Europe. France alone has over 15 million Muslims, and like the U.K, they're all here courtesy of the politicians of their respective countries, past and present. They try to keep the lid on their self imposed dilemma by passing laws banning the expression of any concern at the presence of these 5th columnists. If anything, the I.S. have a better strategy than the Germans of WW2. Think about it. They have in place millions of potentially fanatical troops, all of whom would gladly die for Allah all over Europe. If Adolf Hitler had been so clever we'd all be speaking German now. Side: True.
Yes, a last man standing contest between an alliance of the I.R.A. (roadside bombers) and the U.V.F, (snipers) versus the I.S. (head hackers & suicide bombers). The media could annihilate each other over the exclusivity rights of this ultimate sporting event and the rest of us could all live happily ever after. Naa, somehow I think it wouldn't be long before other groups of murderous low lives came slithering out of the cesspits with a revolutionary political agenda which they would want to impose on the world. Side: True.
|
2
points
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism No, they could not be called Nazi's. They are a Militant Islamic Fundamentalist group, and they aren't even fascist. That isn't political correctness or "liberal double speak". Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
2
points
2
points
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War Aside from wanton murder, ISIS has little if anything in common with Nazism. Why label them as something they are not? The better we understand them, the better chance we have at defeating them. Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1
point
Exactly what could possibly be accomplished by further disparaging an organization already known to be unscrupulously violent? Even ff there is no potential for discussion and understanding with such an organization, there is still no benefit I can see to disparaging them. Doing so only gives them more ammunition to fuel propaganda by which to further indoctrinate others to their cause. The best propaganda is built on truths and half-truths that are spun to invoke specific emotions in the audience. I mean, what? Do you want more recruits for ISIS? Do you want them to have more fuel to inspire further violence and terrorism? Aren't you opposed to them? Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
|