Return to CreateDebate.comJoin this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Debate Info

13
5
Hind sight is 20/20. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:18
Arguments:12
Total Votes:21
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Hind sight is 20/20. (7)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (5)

Debate Creator

jolie(9803) pic



Should Oprah run for president in 2020?

Hind sight is 20/20.

Side Score: 13
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 5
2 points

The last few presidents have proven the old adage that anyone can be president ;)

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
John_C_1812(266) Disputed
1 point

It may look that way. But.

No they really haven’t demonstrated that at all. At best past Executive officers of the United States have only demonstrated that in their given position each lacked the ability to be President.

President is a Military condition. It is how Congress is given the Constitutional right to relieve a President/ Executive Officer of command meaning by both basic principle and legal precedent. Not one or the other it must be both.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

So..., apparently you don't need ability to be president ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
2 points

Yes she should , it’s a done deal if she decides to run unless Kim Kardashian’s decides to give it a go

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
1 point

Yes she should , it’s a done deal if she decides to run unless Kim Kardashian’s decides to give it a go

Or "The Rock", of course

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
2 points

How did I forget “ The Rock “ certainly a strong contender right up there with ....... Caiiytean Jenner 🙀

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
John_C_1812(266) Disputed
1 point

it's illegal no woman has ever provided cause before the United States Constitution on details how she or they as group may seek impartial authority over all men with out a legally Constitutional separation first, such as Marriage, Civil union, Binivir, and UnosMulier.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

She is such a kind, caring and most of all a brave lady. She is a natural born leader. So yes! Of course

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
1 point

Hello j:

I think she'd be a great president..

excon

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.
1 point

You are either

A) joking

or B) literally subhuman

Oprah literally knows nothing. She would be the most incompetent president in history, and she would be the embodiment of everything SJW.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

I don't really care if she runs, hopefully she'll help with the crisis within the African American community and racial tensions. That is if she ran. But I see alot of liberals that are supporting her to run while calling trump an out of touch billionaire who has no political experience, whilst Oprah is exactly the same.

Side: Hind sight is 20/20.

The sarcasm is to say yes she should lead American woman like so many other woman before her into the Civil War against the United States Constitution, plus incriminate the General public every man, woman, and child alike into committing organized crime. As she has proven like many other men before her that a lack of any ability to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution can be profitable. In the real world.

The reality is a woman President is illegal, and by creating of any second real crime was never, will never be suitable alibi to provide protection to the general welfare of the world, United State, or Americans. A woman cannot legally ask, or have voters elect her as President of the United States of America. This is only legal in other Nations who do not have a United State Constitution. Were other Nations hold no legal obligations to this law a Citizen of the United States does have obligation. Creating any United States that directs the commission of a crime in defiance is only a well-planned organized crime. No matter how well worded the idea. Self-defense is not a first Amendment issue as it is a self-value and becomes United States Constitutional issue.

Not that this crime will ever see trial, prosecution, or impartial separation for the protection of the General public. Sadly with heavy heart it is too late. Only congressional hearings on relevance to international Civil War may be found as time had expired to use impartiality separation to limit any damages created by unregulated democracy and its relationship to crime. A self-incriminating or civil barrier was not just domestically enacted it was intentional imposed by civil litigation first, when it was on one crime and not two. This direction gave no protection to the public. The United States Constitutional common defense to general welfare describes Oprah would be running for Prasedera, this is a common defense to a known crime placed on witnesses, who are being directed by vote if a woman asking, NOT TELL for ballot to be placed as Executive officer. Unless she can prove legally detail how a woman might be allowed to speak for all men in a United State, by basic principle. It is her own gender which prevents this one fact. It is not ever prevented by any man alive. Those men who may seek credit for this power lie.

In Closing by State of the Union obtaining the Title of President is one of the hardest Military positions to obtain in the world. It is the most misunderstood demonstrations of ability any leader of Well Organized Democracy called a Republic has ever sought. Unlike politics it has one purpose and one purpose only. A responsibility to demonstrate the resolution of one documents ability.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!