Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

Not only did they see it figuratively, he gave them hope. He reinstated the military for the defense of the country. He helped I'm rebuilding and fortifying the German infrastructure. He also fought to regain "German" territories stripped after WW1. He was a terrible human being and did disgusting things, but I can see why he was voted in and loved in the beginning.

No one said one was ok over the other. If you eat Doritos off the floor you just have to understand that there's risks of getting sick. Same with putting genitals in your mouth.

And unless she is raped, it was her decision too. What if she didn't take precautions to avoid getting pregnant? What if a condom breaks, that's not necessarily a man's fault. You can't shame people based on their sexuality. You can, however, make women take responsibility for their choice as well. If I don't want the child, but she does there should be something in place where I can opt out of paying child support. Or if I do want it, and she doesn't, there should also be some sort of agreement where I pay for everything and then get full custody.

Yes, and the rights of being a father only come into play after the child is born. Then comes all the responsibility. All responsibility and "rights" come into play especially when matters of child support are in question.

I wouldn't say women are more privileged than men. However, it's also unfair to assume that men are more privileged than women. Sometimes women have the upper hand, and at others men do. In the United States, for example, Men and Women have equal opportunities.

I've spent time with women that fit these categories and they all have terrible stories to tell. Yet everything you mentioned is all woman-centered.

Where's the refuge center for men that suffer domestic abuse? After all, it's not about gender, race, or strength, domestic abuse is about power and control and it can be both physical and psychological. Yet if a man is abused he is laughed at or he receives very little help, if any. Most stay quiet out of shame.

What about the fathers that had the mothers of their children disappear? The men that lost the custody battle. The men who's partner had an abortion without his say. On the other hand a woman can choose to keep the child, again without the say of the father or even against his wishes, yet he is forced to pay her for something he never wanted.

Where's the support groups for all the men that are raped. Especially the men coming out of jail. How about the men that are raped by spouses or partners? Because he always has to be ready and willing, and if he isn't he doesn't love his partner enough or is considered less of a man.

What about the support groups for the men that are falsely accused of rape or domestic violence? Theit reputation is shattered and it's hard for them to get back on their fee.

Why is that men every year for the Last 30 years have had the highest number of suicide and yet very little media attention or help is given?

I'd say women are a little more privileged than men when it comes to receiving help when they fall prey or victim to these sort of terrible things.

Yes they are gradual, and that is why I say there's a fair disadvantage. Over time she might drop to the muscle mass of other women and I can see how hormones can make that happen. But until then, I'm really liking that BMI idea you had.

Thank you for being as civil and respectful as I was. Always make the best debates in my opinion. Never any need for name calling and such.

They do it often. However, they receive very little or no media coverage because they are just friendlies/preparation matches. And because of the physiological differences the ladies always have a hard time. Men's under-17, Under-19, under-21, and under 23 teams on occasion play friendlies against the older men's teams. The younger teams usually have trouble. A quick Google search not just for US teams, but look up globally if you really want to see the global stats. There's very little coverage of men vs woman in professional sports, true. But small singular events show up. Like when one of the Williams sisters (tennis) challenged a male opponent and she happened to lose against him. The guy was even that highly rated in the male version of the sport. Again, his speed, height and strength played a role. I argue that physiological advantage is very significant in sports, which deal with having top notch physical attributes.

Men athletes have their appearance questioned all the time. Back to soccer again. New crazy hair dos are mocked. Players are scrutinized for getting "fat." Many other things of the like happen all the time. Women athletes are celebrated by the media, even if they are not stay at home moms. That's just an assumption. It rarely happens today, at least not in the more progressive countries. I'm not sure about beauty products, I have rarely seen it. I'm sure, however, that the ladies, just like the men, are sponsored by certain brands that they have to talk about at some point.

Anyways, thanks for the talk, barely started on this site. I love debating, so I have bright hopes for my future participation here. Mostly thanks to you showing me that not everyone is a nonsensical troll. Thanks again and see you around.

Well since I did say I wasn't a biologist or an expert, I wasn't sure about the affects of HRT on the body. I did a few hours of research and usually what turned up on MTF Transgender people is that the loss of muscle mass was gradual. I'm not certain about Fox's situation, but because she does have a vigorous work out routin. I'm sure the loss of muscle mass is not significant, at least when compared to other female fighters.

I didn't say we should stop Fox from fighting. That is not my place and I actually disagree with that. The question was if she had an unfair advantage or not. And I believe she does, however slight. In fighting strength and muscle mass in proportion to weight are significant.

You're right that the original/primary reason for segregated sports was that women athletes/athletics were not as supported as men's. I'm not arguing against that. I'm saying that now, I believe that men's "better" physical attributes (strength, height, speed) are probably the reason they are separated now. And a reason they will probably remain seperated. Tactics and strategy does help somewhat, but as shown by the loss of arguably the best Women's soccer team, physical disadvantage can be detrimental. At least in soccer. No, we can't judge it off of one game. But that is not the only time it's happened. When an under-17 team plays a professional men's team, the under-17 loses. A huge part of that is skill level and some physical attributes. These are things the boys lack because they havn't developed them through playing and they haven't had the training the professional sports players have. It's arguable that the USWNT was at a much better level tactically than the U-17 boys, but they lost. And I'd argue that it was because of the speed, strength, and height advantage the boys had that would only increase with age.

Yes, some countries are sexist, I don't disagree. But woman's sports are on the rise. Unfortunately, some things don't change over night. Woman's soccer, for example, is at a much better place than it was even 5 years ago. I'd say that's a huge win.

And money does play a huge role. Even looking at men's soccer teams you see that. There's plenty of leagues that have very little funding and thus are not very competitive. As I said earlier though, this woman's world cup has been the best financially supported and the one that has gotten the most media coverage. I consider that a win. Not everything was perfect, but give it time.

Finally everyone has to deal with looking good on camera, with their sexuality, and with dealing with their kids. Why do men sport stars go out with expensive hair-dos if they're gunna get messed up during the match? Why do they get paid thousands to do nude or semi nude modeling jobs? I don't know much about sport stars personal lives, but I know they have free time. And a lot of it. I'm sure those fathers devote that time to their families.

Anyways we got way off topic. Basically, Fox has an unfair advantage as slight as it may be, but do I believe she should be removed from the sport? Nope.

I'm not a biologist in any way, but how much would the hormones affect her? Technically her body already grew. I can see hormones affect things like her voice and body hair, but her muscle mass? I doubt that will be affected. Even if she is getting estrogen, the workouts she does, which I'm sure are as vigouros as any fighter, would make the changes on her muscle mass basically inexistent.Besides that, a male 135 lb body is usually stronger than a female of the same weight, taking into consideration that they have the same fitness level. Why? The way it's built. Look at the muscle tone of Rousey (shown in the vid) and compare it to that of a male fighter of her same weight and height.

Secondly, I agree on the historical backgrounds of sports that you mentioned. I have no idea why you brought that up, but I'd have to say that now, there is very little sexism. Maybe by fans? Not by the industry, however. Mostly because women's sports are beginning to gain momentum, are they paid as much? No, but that's because they don't provide the monetary value that men's sports do, unfortunately.

The only sport I watch is football(soccer). And the sports are segregated because the women wouldn't be able to compete with the strength, height, and speed of their male counterparts. Not being sexist or bigotted, but the USWNT have played against men's teams before. The women played the under-17 men's team and lost 8-2. That would never happen to the men's team. I say we support women's sports, I'm not against them in any way. And when it's fair, same sex (when you consider strength, height, speed) they are actually very competitive and fun to watch.

She went through puberty having the body of a man. I understand that she's a woman. Mentally and emotionally she feels like she's a woman and I get that. Having said that, she will develop muscle tone similar to a man. This is unfair to all the other woman in the sport. We have male and female sports for the reason that women's muscle tone doesn't get to the point of a man's. Are female body builders bigger and stronger than me? Sure, but they are not bigger/stronger than male body builders. Basically, her strength potential is higher than other female competitors because her body is essentially built like man's, that's unfortunate for her and her situation.