Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Patricia_h
| Reward Points: | 10 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
| Arguments: | 13 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
so using the atomic bomb as an example would have wasted the money
but what about the people hiding in or something all were still alive even after the atomic bomb
but it is war and morals have no room in war! its kill or be killed
the army wont have a chance because the people how supported them will be gone
yes so using the atomic bomb was necessary cause we where deafening our selves
yes but that other way would have resulted in thousands of soldiers dieing giving the Japanese a chance to win
besides if you use one bomb to scare them then we only have one bomb left and it took two to make the Japanese surrender
but you wan't the government to surrender and losing one island won't help anything
actually the bombed cities that had war manufacturing so yes the cities they bombed did have army value
Scaring people sometimes doesn't get a chance to win a war you have to actually do what is need to be done
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
