Or I'll post your IQ in public.

Nobody cares what you post in public.

On a serious note, literally every small iota of credibility you ever possessed vanished when you wrote t = -t1.

You never explained what exactly is wrong with t = -t1. What's wrong with variable sunbstitutions? Here's a substitution which helps solve an equation: https://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/This substitutionhelpssolvethe4thorder_equation

I used t1 deleberately for the new variable although it could have been any other variable name.

Shut up.

Or what?

On a serious note, you could make this site much better by refraining from posting such rubbish in the future.

What rating should be assigned to Buritto's "debates" about his penis?

Any luck so far ?

To the downvoter: care to explain yourself ?

But those 5 things you mentioned were originated by Americans.

Yes they were, that is why I think America is the example Russia should follow - not the SJW bullshit, but the actual liberalism which is the basis of your Constitution.

Compared to places like Russia, I can see how those ideals can seem liberal.

They were actually liberal, i.e. based on liberal philosophy as layed out by Locke and Hume and others. In the 20th century deep state politicians made a concerted effort to redefine and obfuscate that term. And they have succeeded.

American conservatives are Russia's liberals.

Our opposition has a lot of "liberals" who follow every whim of the US deep state political elite, i.e. neolibs. They get trashed by putinist propaganda because of the obvious flaws of modern day neoliberalism. We have almost no real liberals. I am a liberal and I'm against neomarxist bullshit like LGBTQI rights and such like. Which is very unusual for Russia.

But American liberals want to change the constitution.

Yes the neolibs want to change the Consitution. Actually Russia also has a Constitution and it isn't all that bad. But the checks and balances section is almost nonexistent and so Putin goes unchecked and violates the Constituion all the time. He basically uses it as toliet paper, as Russians say. And whenever he is called out on that, putinist propagandists always use same propaganda trick - saying that his oponents are liberals who want to make Russia run by gays, just like the US. And they win every time against the so-called "opposition". But not when they argue with me.

Liberalism used to mean an ideology based around the following principles:

1. Proclaiming individual freedom as an absoulute value that superseeds collective interests.

2. Only strong individuals can form a strong and functional state.

3. Individuals have god-given innate rights ("human rights", the theological argument was later forgotten). These rights include freedom of speach, freedom of peacful assembly, the right to defend yourself in court, freedom of religion, freedom of trade, freedom of enterprise, right to fair trial by law.

4. Everyone is equal before the law and laws should grant everyone equal opportunities.

5. The excercise of rights by an individual should not violate the rights of other individuals.

These are the principles on which both the Declaration of Independance and the Constitution are based upon. And they are liberal documents.

A liberal can be conservative on some issues and progressive on other issues. As were the founding fathers.

Neolibs stand for a different set of ideas:

- equality of outcome

- identity politics

- affirmative action

- positive discriminaiton

- restricting freedom of speech

- subverting due process

These are not liberal principles. They are neomarxist/ postmodernist ideas. All of the PC bullshit and SJW bullshit is not liberalism.

Making this distinciton is important to me, precisely because I stand against Putinism. Putinists use the insanity of the neolib movement to smear liberalism. So whenever you start talking about human rights in Russia you are immediately called a "libtard", which in Russian sounds like "faggot".

I consider myself a liberal, and I am an enemy of both Putin and the neolibs.

The Declaration of Independance is a liberal document, and so is the Constitution...Something doesn't add up. Maybe these neolibs aren't really liberals? The word "liberal" has been hijacked. Have you thought of that?

Interesting...so the US was founded by a bunch of pussies?

Is that the question you ask them? "Are you bipolar or bisexual?"

You mean so that the cops get a legitimate reason to open fire ?

So you've redefined abortion and redefined murder, in order to reach the conclusion that killing a newborn child is not murder...And I'm the one twisting your words? You have twisted your own moral into a knot. And just for the record, all of this BS is completely unconstitutional. Not that you would care.

I am a human being, killing me is murder.

Oh I agree with that. But that's not your definition of murder. In a previous debate, you have argued that post-birth abortion would not be murder if we defined it as 'neccesary', since murder is the 'unnecessary' killing of a human being. So no strawman here.

Right...so if you're retroactively aborted, it won't count as murder, according to your own moral code. Case closed.

The following questions remain unanswered:

1. WHAT WAS IN THE BAG?

2. Why was it so important for you to know what was in the bag?

Perhaps a Senate comission could help establish the truth of the matter.

Imagine what would happen if a gender neutral Santa, his transgendered elves and the bisexual reindeer were to invade a locker room of their preffered choice. They would scare the hell out of all the kids.

Perhaps those people are bi-gendered ?

Some of them do and it's hateful not to respect their choice of clothes and/or their choice of beard or lack of therein. You might even be called Adolph Hitler for doing that. (BTW I have no idea what the hell I'm saying & thanks for this debate)

Ony if you're a hateful transphobic bigot .

Obama supported the lynching of Jews and Christians by ISIS. If he was president during WW2 he would have married Hitler and sucked his balls dry.

People Continue To Believe That Ridiculous Idea. I Can't Change Their Thoughts.

A quote from your previous post in this tread, with reference to the "ridiculous idea" that people choose to be gay.

you telling me that I blindly follow this gay rights bandwagon is dumb

Saying that it's a "ridiculous idea" to think that people choose to be gay, without providing any serious proof to the contrary, is blindly following the gay rights bandwagon. Your "when did you choose to be" non-argument, is what I was referring to when I spoke of "cliches".

"Asking if I report to Obama is dumb without question."

How is it dumb? Many of your colleagues have played a huge role in implementing his political agenda, which often goes against the will of the people.

With regard to these issues, you demonstrate the same techniques of "debating without debating", as in some...of these institutions where the said people work.

Which is unusual for a person who can actually debate.

Yes I know about the three branches of power, but...rules can be bent, can't they? They have been many times in your country (and many more times in mine).

Saying "dumb" so many times looks like defensive aggression on your side.

Man, this is a really dumb post for you. You should stop and think a little bit on this one.

Well, you were first to say "dumb", and to imply I did was not thinking when I was posting. This, of course, proves that I'm dumb...even if I call you dumb now, I'll be second and so it won't count.

You want a sincere answer to whether I report to Barack Obama? Really?

Ok, here's the deal.

In many debates you demonstrate a very good grasp of logic. Othertimes it's just a good rhethorical habit, which still requires a high level of intellect.

At the same time, you defend the so-called "gay agenda" cause totally, without question, even the most stupid and unscientific aspects of it. You are an ardent supporter of every "gay rights" banality, as long as it's spread by your mass media. All your arguments, in any debate about these issues that I've seen, repeat the stupidest available cliches.

To me, this is an indication of a clear bias on your side, with regard to the so-called "gay rights" issue.

Your profession would rule out a possibility of personal bias on such global issues...which leaves me to conclude that it's political bias.

This is consistant with the fact, that in many of your states the courts make decisions on the so-called "gay rights" subject, which go against the will of the people. These decisions always support the political trend of the Obama administration.

So, my question wasn't so "dumb", after all.

Thank you for this information, which concerns the US judical system.

With regard to spreading these unscientific ideas, do you report directly to Barack? Or some of his cronies?

I would appreciate a sincere answer, and I'm sure I won't get one from you.

Just for the record, and so we don't start a meaningless conversation: I detest Putin.

Anyone can get AIDS. However, gays contract AIDS and syphylis at an unproportional rate, compared to their total number. This is what my CDC quote was reffering to.