Someone search for "naked blonde" on the search bar

1/3 of your life is spent sleeping

Captain America doing American stuff

Theres also plenty more advance technologies that the wild has mastered before humans.

Such as the Hydrogen Economy of Termites, Navigation System of Pigeons and more

Dark Humor and joecavalry does not mix. Sorry

True that biological weapons has less damage than nuclears. But they can be easily mass produced and does not demand too much care

What it lacks in destruction, it makes up in numbers

but either way, I support banning them both

Every user in a humor site that uses breast as avatar is obviously a male

No need. Your post reads people

Ok....am I still drunk or someone posted something so ridiculou-oh wait, its from joe. Nevermind

I might get rape if I stayed here longer

uh...may I ask exactly what are you talking about?

Nothing really worth arguing about. Just another display of the immaturity of humans.

In the role of reproduction, men do not get pregnant, has no cravings, can pee anywhere they want, and takes only 10 seconds to get aroused

In terms of society, men are still in dominance because they are rational more than emotional, has strength for heavy jobs and does not need much attention

In individual terms, men are lucky. But in the long run, women has the higher chance of survival because of the strong organization and mental support.

Males has the full dominance in terms of reproduction and role in the society. But at the same time this advantages turns into a nightmare for themdue to their machismo mentality

1. They are looked down upon when they cry

2. Their friends are not there when they needed affection

3. No matter how much they crave for skin contact, they cant

More complaints are made by women because men ends up killing themselves first

No, being artist, is the excuse to be a pervert. (as well as scientists, and doctors)

Never bought one, because the internet is the only library i will ever need.

But then, if the book your talking about is something that edges between written by a holy man, or a false apostle, then I might consider it.

Interesting images. Never thought your an artist.

Well done, you just amused everyone

P.S

THe credits im talking about is your supposed to be signature at the bottom of the pic. Every artist leaves one

Thanks, but I am planning to share this to image sharing sites. It appears that you have failed to add credits.

Also, can i criticize? The yellow font was a pain to look at. White with black outline fits all

Very funny poem though, ill give you that

............................

You need a background image.

.............................

Technically speaking. They are called Terrorist because they only seek to spread terror.

Terrorists is different from Rebels

Terrorists are like Bandits with well funded weapons

Last time I saw it, the photo was half.

Must be just my internet connection (again)

It is called "Inner Demon" for a reason. And with that reason, my inner demon is my mortal enemy, but doesnt mean enemy doesnt mean I cant learn anything from it

P.S

We need the full photo

Trolling is an art. The more you exhaust it, the less creative you will be. Once you reach that breaking point, the only one being trolled will be you.

Just sayin

Then I guess theres a third kind of person

"Those who can extrapolate data...................and those that flies through the desert in your canoe, and wonders how many pancakes does it take to cover a dog house. Only to realize that the chicken bone is not in the applesauce."

I am soooo....not an artist

Alice: Ive chased some playful bunnies, met a stoned caterpillar, a cat on pills, a female Kim Jong Un and her army of malnourished soldiers, ate some shrooms and smoked some pop. What brought you here?

Dorothy: A tornado took my house and I met some dudes who has no heart, no brain and no courage.

Alice: You mean politicians left you homeless?

You do realize that the title says "Contributed" and not "Created by Nature", right?

Well, there is a reason why you are not hilarious. You wont grow till you found your own answers

yes

Yes

YeS

YES!

That is a video about what will happen if the sun dissappeared. It said nothing about Humans being incapable of destroying Earth.

Which, I suppose, is another topic

Th Christian community follows 2. But the society just needs 1- the golden rule

The ending of a good story is the most common example that everyone must have felt

Nope, Atheism is the result of doubt in the Lord. It is not a new religion, it is the absence of it. God created Humanity yes, but this belief just existed on by its own freewill

Remember, you have 2 hands.

The left, the right, and a rifle for warmth

You forgot the destroyer

Or maybe I shouldnt bother cause if you are really worth my time, you wont flee from the topic. Right from the start

Oh well, I still enjoyed the nonsense, though. A few nonsense once in a while is enjoyed by the wise

LOL XD

But lets put an end on the gag talk, shall we?

I just want to know, are you gonna defend your stance from my criticism or not?

Cause if you flee, this will mark as my victory that GW is real. Silence is a sign of submission

Oh master, forgive me, for my presence alone is a sin against your unquestionable wisdom.

I shall commit sefuku for I cannot be cleansed.

Oh master, how can I learn if you will flee from the argument? Am I unworthy? :(

At last, you manned up. And I must say, it was an interesting article.

However, it did not supported your claims at all

You said:

"The scientists at that time said that it would be nearly impossible to fix the problem because the Chinese have greatest influence because they have the largest population and they were NOT going to cut back on their use of CFCs because it would stifle their economy."

- But the article said:

"China and India, the world's two most populated developing countries, have been hesitant to sign the Montreal Protocol and have asked for an international fund to be set up to help them change over to more expensive, but environmentally safe chemicals...."

In fact, China banned ozone depleting CFCs Which states that China was giving effort in the war against Pollution. And therefore disproves your argument

Also, you said:

"And even without the Chinese...., the hole healed itself ;)"

- But your article said:

"The discovery of the Antarctic ozone hole made it clear that international regulation of ozone depleting chemicals was necessary. After nearly five years of negotiations, the Montreal Protocol was adopted in September 1987. The treaty was developed with the guidance of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and went into effect January 1989"

Which states the the Hole was healed using mankinds efforts to change and not out of natural or divine interventions. And disproves your claims once more

.

P.S

Dont try to flee from the topic again.

Oh no master, i am the disciple. And you are supposed to teach me your wisdom. Or am I unworthy to be taught?

OH MY GOD!

Oh great master, I am unworthy to be in your presence

The scientists at that time said that it would be nearly impossible to fix the problem because the Chinese have greatest influence because they have the largest population and they were NOT going to cut back on their use of CFCs because it would stifle their economy. And even without the Chinese...., the hole healed itself ;)

- I asked you for a link for this report. Or is there? ;)

I hope that you can prove this one.

Oh please, please master, enlighten me. Please show me how my statements are...wait...did you said its valid or was it a grammar error?

1. Said by the guy who cannot prove his claims

2. Oh the arrogance

In short, you are unable to prove your claims.

sigh

It is in the rule of arguments to always bear the burden of proof. And your excuse just leaves a bad taste.

Dont change the topic, you just had to admit your lies

.

P.S

You dont have to show that you care, you just had to show that your accusations has a valid foundation. (Which you just failed)

And I suppose that you can give a link for that report?...

"The reason I categorized it as a scare tactic is because I think that the scientists behaved as though they knew more than what they actually did"

-And what makes you think that "the scientists behaved as though they knew more than what they actually did"?

Did they gave a faulty/wrong info about Global Warming or something? Please support your accusations with proper evidences

EDIT:

Im going to sleep

Thats a strong accusation, can you prove that the OzoneDepletion was a lie?

Sure you explained the process of Orbital Forcing, but would you mind explaining the Ozone Depletion