GuitaristDog's Waterfall
It honestly depends what type of homeless person you're talking about. Those mentally ill people who can't make a living? No. Those gutter punks that travel the country? Yes!
Are you serious? You had to had to deal with seeing 9/11 and few bombings. The elderly had to deal with the threat of a nuclear holocaust from the USSR and some of the older ones had to deal with the Axis.
We try to go for "regular intercourse" but then sometimes, you forget to buy condoms...
Wrong, I know a good amount of punk guitarists that couldn't play anything besides a sloppy power chord to save their life but they still get paid to play.
An artist eh? Well, musicians are always more attractive than artists so I don't care ;)
If he was such a great leader why were people fleeing the country? Why were people scared of the government confiscating their property? Why did he shut down media outlets that opposed him? Why did the crime rate under Hugo Chavez go up? Why were there food shortages due to his price controls?
I don't care he pretended to "care about the poor" (confiscating property and giving himself more power) he was a thug dictator. But hey, if you want to be like Carter and remember him for the "good" things he did, that is your choice.
They don't own the system. Funny, they said that Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ghoul would never go broke and someone took their place. Bill Gates, Donald Trump, Steve Jobs, Carnegie, Ghoul, Rockefeller ect. were not born into being billionaires, some of them were born "rich" but its not some dynasty of wealth. The biggest business have fallen, this era is no exception.
http://www.creators.com/opinion/
The bottom 20% doesn't stay at the bottom forever and the top 20% don't stay at the top forever. People are constantly moving up and down. There is no many free market principles left in America, however, there is still a market and markets are not static, they are dynamic.
More like in socialist hell. Hugo Chavez was one of the worst leaders in the past 100 years. You are for socialism (according to you, when the production is controlled by workers, not the government) and democracy, not state-socialism and tyranny, how can you support this man? It would be like me supporting Ngo Dinh Diem simply because he was (sorta, not really) a capitalist.
I am against there being a capital gains tax, income tax or property tax. I don't believe in directly taxing income, labor or property (pertaining to land)
Actually, I would. Who are you to say what I think? That is for me to decide
I'm not saying what you think, I'm saying what you said. You said you were a liberal. You called yourself a progressive. You promoted socialism.
and I prefer DEMOCRATIC socialism which allows the people to vote on the issues.
Your point? Democracy tramples individual rights enough without socialism, seriously, the majority voted for people who supported keeping drugs illegal and gay marriage illegal, is it fair just because its democracy? Of course not.
if you removed all tax loopholes, and charged a flat tax, you would only have to charge 10% of someone's net worth, and that is not a violation of civil rights.
I don't believe in any capital gains, income, property or "net worth" tax.
Actually, you wouldn't fight to death for my rights, you are a progressive liberal who promotes socialism, that tramples my individual economic and social rights.
Nah. The second I bring it back all the democrats would demand I pay my "fair share" (99% of it) to them and their failing programs.
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Your source doesn't account for the cost of labor and fuel rising. It also does not account for the rising demand for food in the nation, and globally.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveodland/
