You're disgusting and a pathetic liar.

I don't consider you worth a link from my profile, especially on the allies list. It looks disgraceful there. We don't really have the feature right now, though, so you're acting more like a sticky parasite there. Luckily, I'm not in too much of a hurry about that.

Now fade away. You're dismissed.

With a grammar of comparable complexity?

I know many don't, but their syntax is much simpler. Many don't even have plural forms for most words.

Also, English is perhaps the only language that does not have gender for objects even with such a grammar.

You should not because I would never (which is actually your first 3 paragraphs combined)

Seriously, who let you on a computer that connects to the Internet?

same for someone with a physical disability like lets go on a walk, oh wait.

The joke's on you.

And for the race thing ofc I will deal with different races differently most races have different cultures so it would make little sense to behave the same way around every culture.

Great. You post definitions without reading them.

Yes, he's someone I'd rather not have at my side anyway, except as a little pawn. They make the positions derogatory.

I don't care about any other part you've said here...

I don't like to nit pick about grammar but the entire statement except the claim is off.

You're the one who doesn't seem to know the littlest things about syntax and structure (not to mention formatting). Try doing your nit picking (seriously?) and show where I was grammatically wrong.

It's just your opinion is not a universal refutation of freaking logic.

And that's even worse than just mindlessly crying that you refuted me, without any reason.

So, you are dismissed. I have already said that I am not replying to that there, if you couldn't comprehend that.

Now fade away.

My claim here didn't really need your demonstration, but whatever.

They did, in 2001.

I've heard that it didn't go well. You'd remember, you're old.

I don't care to know why. Structuralism is dead.

I'd say it depends on how much you want them to forgive you.

As a side note, it'd remind you of something if the website always had a weekly points leaderboard.

Seems like you're obsessed with getting to the top of the leaderboard this time.

Well, I've been around the top for months.

Don't worry about him. He already has hard time figuring out what is said.

We always come far enough from originally intended meanings of words. That's inevitable.

I can't say for sure... I've only heard rumours about people arguing in the corners of the Internet, such as the YouTube comments section.

But from what I've heard, it seems pretty much insane.

Yes, usable information, or pragmatic truths, is a rare thing to come by from them. They seem to reflect more of insecurity than persuasion. Like they want to win over some crowd, as is the case of public debates. But still, with a lot of insecurity.

I wouldn't call it an argument, but the exact word evades me.

Anyway, this is the definition, from the Oxford Dictionary of Law,

A defect of reason, arising from mental disease, that is severe enough to prevent a defendant from knowing what he ...

The one from that page isn't clear enough - it goes into the legalities too soon.

Man, you've been paying him so much attention?

I'd say he must be flattered.

So, the correct term is perseveration.

Also, you know, the problem of induction. Just because something happened doesn't mean that it always will.

I guess I didn't include it earlier. Well, it just sounds rude if you're worth anything.

I'm not replying anymore in this thread unless you can present an argument against me.

I don't care about your random objections - they're meaningless, irrational and worthless.

It is just your opinion that you have refuted...worthless for consideration.

Unless you can present it as an argument.

As a recap,

I said something.

You asked where I said anything.

I told you that.

You asked where I explained it.

I told that and explained that too.

Now you're just crying over how you refuted everything I said.

Here's a little game for you.

Try refuting ANYTHING that I've said.

If you'll just cry over how you refuted everything, which you clearly couldn't even be close to doing, then you're dismissed.

You've said nothing which challenges me. Thus, I have no reason to defend.

But if you need guidance, then you can see my profile.