This is probably true, actually, although I had to sit here for a few moments chewing it over. The best example I can think of to back this up is people who said they would vote for Obama back in the fall out of fear that they would be considered racist if they admitted to supporting McCain.

The determination to give equal rights and always be politically correct may be harmful in that it leads to the acceptance of things that otherwise would not have been accepted. Is this actually harmful? I'm not sure. This is a bit too big for my head, and I'll need to think on it some more.

Is that what you're trying to say?

I would absolutely commit crimes to get that money. Absolutely. 100% yes. I can't imagine anyone who wouldn't.

The bigger they are, the harder they fall!

That's actually true when it comes to nations. I mean, look at Rome.

Well, actually, you have to admit that she needs all the help she can get... and maybe what you consider bad choices she considers good choices! /shrug

People actually need those spots. Will it really kill you to walk the extra couple of yards?

Without face-to-face contact, online debaters can be particularly vicious without feeling any sort of human compassion. I also enjoy classroom debating much more. It's more personal and enjoyable and I love getting fired up and arguing with my peers. :)

Yes, I suppose that's true. It just doesn't feel right, somehow, but for each person it'd be different. I can't judge.

I may be bigoted since I myself am, in fact, female, but I can't imagine wanting to deceive someone about my endowment. Not that I need to. ;)

I love to read. I'm currently reading the fourth "Sookie Stackhouse" novel, "Wuthering Heights," "The Chocolate War," and... I think that's all. On my list of books to read next are "Oliver Twist," "Of Mice and Men," "Fallen Angels," and "Pride and Prejudice."

Don't give up beer! Give up food!

The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

This would work if Kukla's argument didn't hold water and if the governmental programs worked the way they were supposed to. Ho hum.

The real question: how did you get your font in blue and red?

CD was such a lonely, sad place without him.

The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.