Xander's Waterfall
Controlled? Pussy? I swear to god, all of the guys in this debate must be campaigning for the longest dry spell ever. Ladies distribute themselves where they damn well see fit. We aren't property or tradeable or exchangeable- this is like me demanding your testosterone, it's stupid.
Allow me to rebut. I am a liberal lady, and my lady-parts aren't property- they're a part of my person, which isn't property either. Treating ladies like cargo isn't going to get anyone laid- not that YOU would know ANYTHING about not getting laid.
Yes- he immigrated from Africa. My babysitter when I was younger was French-American, and preferred to be referred to as such, though racially (social construct, I know) she was black. one should be classified by most recent descent IF that's what they prefer. it would be easier to not have to fight over race, though, and make more meaningful distinctions- perhaps ethnically? I suppose then you would have lots of small ethnic groups in areas with indigenous population in a relatively intact state; Western Europe an America would probably bleed together into a sort of Euro-merican ethnicity, with sub-groups within,
Hey. Whoa. Resentment!
What's more, liberals are pretty much always (as a group) way younger than conservatives- which makes us way more attractive.
ALSO, what is this "their" women bullshit? "Oh, yeah, I took Jane-the-Sweater from Bob the other day. Man, he was pissed, but what a perfect fit!"
Ladies aren't a resource, and we can sleep with whomsoever we feel- whatever political party they are affiliated with.
If you're in any position to -dar, then it's pretty accurate. then again, I only gaydar on those I have good reason to believe are gay- the ultra conservative, super sensitive friend who always checks out guys asses, for instance, or the girl who seems to take every opportunity that presents itself to make out with other girls. Those people? Probably bi or gay. Otherwise, ehhhh, whatever.
Man, this is why you should stick around. I don't agree with a bunch of stuff you say, but you have the BEST witty commentary.
Also, how do you do bold/italics? I don't want to look like an idiot trying to figure out the necessary punctuation in debates, and you seem to know.
Neither Gore nor Monckton have any business discussing climate change, as neither are scientists. Also, if someone refuses to accept data, you just CAN'T argue with them.
Examples:
Comprehensive sex education lowers abortion, unplanned pregnancy, and STI rates, without lowering age of first sexual action. But it "destroys families!"
Evolution is a clearly documented phenomena, and makes perfect sense when looking at other even more clearly documented phenomena. But "God created the world!".
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it reasonable!
It's neither/both! Homosexuality, I would say, is a normal behavior as behaviors go but there's probably some sort of genetic disposition somewhere somehow. Being gay, though, has more to do with a community- The Gay Community. Many people identify as heterosexual but have homosexual behaviors, because they don't associate with the gay identity. So, really, it's all semantics!
I wish REAL boobs did this this prettily....
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
Nope! Because there is objective evidence about climate change and the role of CO2 in it. Also, if global climate change is a threat, then we'll know soon enough!
Intelligent design however, is mostly just ridiculous! Any being patient enough to design cells and genetic material COULDN'T be ADHD enough to let the dinosaurs go.
