Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

What do you mean it was defending the sovereignty of Tibet? Tibet was never an independent territory to start with?

So, Mr Hoong, what's your point then? Please show some thinking and share with us what you think about the debate motion...

China has the right of claim as the Aksai chin area belongs to her.

Hey hello Golden Eagle, which side of the fence are you on?

No objection doesn't mean endorsement. What the Chinese leader meant was that he had no claims over India-controlled territory, but Aksai Chin wasn't even an Indian territory at the beginning! So... what are you trying to say?

What do you mean in saying that 'India had claimed Aksai Chin even before China had control of Tibet'?

The Aksai Chin area was part of Tibet's territory, isn't it?

So, what is your point? India was the victim in this case and that it was unjustly bullied by China?

It definitely has to be China as the disputed territory falls within the geographical boundaries of Tibet, which is within Chinese political jurisdiction.

So.....? Aggressive India means that it will lose it's right of claim?

Then to whom does Aksai Chin belong to? UN? No men's land?