We don't address any of the issues with abortion in America.

The religious right is not affected at all.

Then why does God not see in 3D when you talk about Him?

I do see Christians constantly talking about Allah and they think he is fictional. If Christians couldn't get married because of the Easter Bunny they would definitely start talking about him.

I got a newsflash for you: a debate website might not be the right thing for you. ;)

What would a proper disagreement look like?

Inspiring things = making sure you are wrong?

Your case is probably a hopeless one.

Disagreeing with me = making sure you are wrong. It is getting pretty hopeless trying to get you to understand anything.

If such are your claims, then I'm not surprised to see nothing that could be called as reasoning

Someone saying they give their reasoning causes you to be less surprised that there is no reasoning given. Why? Are you that untrusting?

Though I didn't need an example, thanks anyway.

You don't understand the difference between facts and opinions.

I don't think I agreed to any such thing.

So you are trying to make sure you are wrong.

I wonder why you do.

Then read my posts. I actually give my reasoning, unlike yourself.

But then again, you like to cling

To opinions that aren't true.

But then again, you like to accuse me of the things you are guilty of.

Thanks man. I am glad you could agree that you don't inspire anything in anyone.

Only in your Hitler loving world would you be so determined to make sure you are wrong about everything.

Ha, you are so fucking dumb. The only thing that you could even remotely claim you inspire is my anger and you are too dumb to even take credit for it.

You don't inspire anything in anyone.

Congratulations. Your joke image proves there is more than 1 answer.

That's not really a great idea in your case.

You can try to sound like a conservative all you want, but it is too late for you.

How very liberal of you to propose laws for things that are already illegal.

Well, let me know when you detect what that theoretical limit is. I see no end to it.

Are you retarded? FromWithin is an admitted progressive just like you. Of course it is the progressives that are insane.

Don't you read the crazy stuff FromWithin accuse people of?

It was bad enough when you were treating gays like special sinners. Now you want to treat them like criminals. You are a truly evil person. No wonder you are a baby murderer.

Hahahaha. Good one.

Fair enough. Good point.

If it doesn't refute Darwinian evolution, it does support it in some way.

Are you hitting on me? That's fucking creepy.

Gave what away? Trump gives away that he doesn't have an IQ over 150 every time he speaks.

You just responded to yourself to ask the person you responded to if they voted for Trump. Your insanity is running wild.

Actually, the reason why liberals don't understand Trump is because every single thing out of his mouth is a lie.

Wow, you think Trump has an IQ of 156? Damn, Trump supporters are super gullible. He won because he can get idiots to believe anything.

Its easy to take things out of context and stitch together nonsense surrounding the falicies promoted regarding God's word.

It must be easy if you have mastered it. :)

Oh man, you are fucked then. Sorry to hear that.

How do you objectively show someone is offensive?

You just admitted Hillary was correct when she called half of Trumps supporters deplorable. Good job

Your statement is useless unless you believe in every situation you can be right and inoffensive. Do you believe that? Because you aren't saying that.

You want us to look at a fake argument that the person made up?

Wow. You contradicted your first sentence with your second sentence. That's amazing.

"Liberal" is a simple, one word, label.

Kind of like using everything against liberals. That's a pretty simple view of the world.

Nothing else was actually an insult.

You call people dogmatist. That's your go to insult. If that's your idea of skillful at insults you have a lot to learn.

Captain obvious knows everything, but he never figured out my stance. How interesting. How can you claim that you tried to have a debate?

Just agree that it is always therapy even in the case of revolt.

You are a dogmatist that hates dogmatists. That's hypocrisy.

Your insult skills are awful in this debate.

Wow. What a strong insult. Too bad your insult skills aren't on par with your hypocrisy skills.

Admit that you agree with what I have said about the topic. I take that option.

And not typing the "obvious" explanations is dogmatic. Also, claiming that the answer is obvious is fallacious. So, you are objectively a bad debater, and you are a hypocrite. Congratulations.

Yes. Continue to provide no explanation. Continue to claim that your statements are true without justification. Continue to fit the definition of dogmatist perfectly.

"No, I'm just saying that it would be true for you that I'm a dogmatist, because it is useful for you to believe as it won't pain you by bursting your bubble of ignorance."

You stated this in response to me asking why my bubble would burst. Good job, dogmatist.

I did. You state things as fact without providing any reasons for it.

Look at the difference between you and me. You claim I didn't say something and I repeat what I said for you. You (a dogmatist) just go on saying your "facts".

The other parts of your message seem redundant.

It seems redundant because you still haven't addressed the fact that you didn't give your opinion from the beginning.