Yes, but the word retrieve isn't used here, I could say to you I don't see that as being the only meaning for get.

Let me give you an example. You call an exterminator, and frantically you say, get these bugs out of my house. When you say that does that mean you want him to capture them, safely, and give them to you? It absolutely does not, it means you want them removed. The phrase "get...out" does not mean retrieve, it means remove.

So I take you back to my initial question, does it has to be a live? This is both a valid question, and assuming they just want the cat out of the tree, and nothing more, it's a valid answer, since I would effectively be able to remove the cat from the tree if it were dead, but ultimately in asking I was ensuring that they wanted it removed, instead of retrieved.

To retrieve would be to get it for someone, to simply get it out of the tree is at the bottom line meaning remove it from the tree. So I take you back, if we aren't calling a dead cat a cat, it's no longer a cat in the tree, I got it out. If we are calling it a cat, then after killing said cat, I can go and get it out of the tree, if they wanted me to retrieve it, then I'd get it out for them.

It should also be noted I asked if it had to be alive, which is a valid question since the question asks how to get a cat out of a tree, not how to retrieve a cat.

But there is no longer a "cat" in the tree, I could also go up and retrieve the corpse afterwards since now it'll be less inclined to scratch me.

True, then semantically I am also correct to say that if I kill the cat and get it out of the tree, I'd be getting the cat out of the tree, since it could be called a dead cat.

In fact, I'm correct even if it'd only be correct to call it a corpse, because once the cat is dead, and is now a corpse, there would no longer be a cat in a tree.

Also a dead cat. Arguing semantics is silly.

How does one know if they are in fact a dumb motherfucker? If the standard is that a dumb motherfucker will think a smart motherfucker is crazy, then does that make any motherfucker who sounds crazy a smart motherfucker? If that is the case, then how do we know the motherfuckers locked up in insanity wards aren't actually geniuses and we're all just dumb motherfuckers? To take it one step further, what of the actual crazy motherfuckers? How do we actually identify them, assuming we have the smart motherfuckers, and the dumb motherfuckers figured out based on this standard, of smart motherfuckers sounding crazy to dumb motherfuckers.

Does it have to be alive?

Note: at the time I asked this question, the debate was titled "Does anyone have any ideas on how to get a cat out of a tree?" which is the prompt I am responding to.

I object to the assumption that she must be bored

Well if you're choosing a leader whom we know is corrupt and in it for luxury, then you'll be seeing this debate very one sided. As the question asks," is the leader of every terrorist/freedom fighter yadda yadda" with the option I proposed the answer is, not really.

They are living better lives than those who do the fighting, but those who do the fighting are either dying, or living in trenches and barracks, not a great upgrade needs to be made to live a better life than that.

As for why they are not living an equally horrible life (out their on the field) is because they are the leaders. They are valued higher, and must be kept safer, and less stressed to make the battle decisions for those with the physical ability to carry out.

False dichotomy, I did not use the term 'high' I used the term 'strung out'.

Also, the video proves that at least at one point he was high. Higher off the ground even that the officer if I'm remembering correctly, when he climbed the pole.

Check and mate.

What was he strung out on?

I can probably run faster than any tub of lard that's pissed I called her on her health problems. I'm a male, so that makes this generalization false.

Most people don't want to admit they are wrong, so arguing with anyone really would prove to be a nit picking battle of whoever feels like saying how they feel the longest.

Another reason I feel is true, is that most people on here don't actually read other's arguments.

Thanks, that was a good laugh.

Probably scoping it out to see if leaving is the best option. If he is still here, I say don't leave. Getting into a huffy over some ignorant, annoying users is silly, since nothing they say actually matters anyway.

If he's not, then Whoo party hard, I never liked that guy ;)

That's bigoted towards the the nutcracker.

I, as a dancer born in a humans body, am appalled to see that people still exist like this in the world. I have a fiery soul, sending burning passion through my veins, and I need to let it out. If you can't accept that, then get of the stage because it's my time to shine.

Feminism. What is it really? It's the promotion of women's rights, with little consideration given to men's rights, to make women and men equal. This was the case when it was first thought up as an idea, when men actually had more rights than women.

Feminism was needed back before the several amendments making us equal were put into place, and laws were made to prevent unequal treatment.

This is a horrible Photoshop, the head looks unnaturally attached to the body.

Not much is applicable outside of sex?

Get married, and you'll learn from sex, how to knock a few strokes off your golf game ;)

That joke was terrible, I apologize.

How to have sex...

This is weak. I understand logical to a fault, and trying to discourage troll posts, by using logic to a fault, but the idea that hard can only relate to a texture, is literally myopic.

I really hate to say, I agree with Joe. Replace hard, with difficult and try again please.

That last joke is hilarious, but I wanted to say he didn't ruin his parent's marriage, he was a kid when his father ruined it with lies and cheating, the kid was just a sorta clever but mostly dumb kid who took advantage of an opportunity.

Isthisthetacticjoeusesonthissite

So you agree! :) Glad i could convince you to the correct way of thinking. Pleasure debating with you.

I don't know where, but I know I saw this before. As I read the debate title, my mind imagined the images that would be here. They were the same.

The noun usage is derived from the verb usage. Two halves are plural, even thought they are apart of one whole.

The sandwich part, is being pressed between two other people or things. It may be one solid slice, but it is pressed between the two halves that extend out. You can sandwich a hotdog between two halves of bun or bread.

So now I ask, where is that definition assured?

Congrats you proved that slices of bread make a sandwich. When do you plan on proving that food stuffed between two bread halves is not a sandwich. I am pretty certain (not using sarcasm, I didn't re read my own argument so I'm not 100% certain) that I asked, what rule of sandwiches states that the slices must be separate?

According to what law, do the sandwich slices have to be separated?

The picture I showed you, is the traditional way to cut a subway sandwich.

Want to add anything new to your argument? I showed you how it does, and an example of one. The definition of sandwich, is pressed between two.(basically). If food (namely a hotdog or some salami) is sandwiched between two halves of bread, to say it's not a sandwich is just denying the definition, and is wrong.

Actually, it does matter....Subs are sandwiches anyways.

Not always

If that were the case vibrators would never had been invented, or marketed technically.

Same for a sub.

I never though it was not. If a submarine sandwich is a sandwich, then a hotdog is too.

I just wound't feel comfortable calling a hotdog (on a bun obviously) a sub. It feels weird.

Climbing a mountain alone. Risk of falling added to the heart attack and no possibility of anyone coming to your aid, because at least when playing charades someone could see you and could realize the issue.

I'd argue that if people know you suck as an actor, or have previously not acted out the heart attack scene so well, that when you suddenly act it out very well it'd raise a red flag, however I get the humor.

Can you automatically assume a person is stupid anytime after immediately?

Maybe not a fix, but it's a good enough band-aid.

DO I have to buy the phone or the jeans, or will they just be sent to me?

Because if I can just get an iPhone, sure I'll take it. It'd be fun for a few weeks what with all the gadgets and apps. Plus skinny jeans suck, whether you have a big phone or not. Try putting your wallet in there.

However, I'm choosing this side because I'm assuming I Have to actually go and buy it. This side would be way cheaper.

What if my problem is that I have too much free time?

7¾ years.

Whatever they are offering, real or fake, people are willing to buy it. The capitalist way dictates, if people will buy it, sell it.

Holy shit, three pyramids, managed to form a triangle on a map! It must be the work of the Illuminati.

Spider-Man has been in that position.

He's the worst example to bitch about provocative or flexible poses, he's constantly seen contorting in ways you'd expect female characters to. His signature pose (like when all the heroes stand around and look bad ass) is normally showing off his flexibility and acrobatics. He's rarely seen standing pround and heroic like maybe Captain America or Wolverine.

Honestly, just Google image Spider-Man, or even better Spider-Man pose, and count off the ratio of gender stereotypical 'male' poses and 'female' poses.

Typical Joe...