Yes, but the word retrieve isn't used here, I could say to you I don't see that as being the only meaning for get.

Let me give you an example. You call an exterminator, and frantically you say, get these bugs out of my house. When you say that does that mean you want him to capture them, safely, and give them to you? It absolutely does not, it means you want them removed. The phrase "get...out" does not mean retrieve, it means remove.

So I take you back to my initial question, does it has to be a live? This is both a valid question, and assuming they just want the cat out of the tree, and nothing more, it's a valid answer, since I would effectively be able to remove the cat from the tree if it were dead, but ultimately in asking I was ensuring that they wanted it removed, instead of retrieved.

To retrieve would be to get it for someone, to simply get it out of the tree is at the bottom line meaning remove it from the tree. So I take you back, if we aren't calling a dead cat a cat, it's no longer a cat in the tree, I got it out. If we are calling it a cat, then after killing said cat, I can go and get it out of the tree, if they wanted me to retrieve it, then I'd get it out for them.

It should also be noted I asked if it had to be alive, which is a valid question since the question asks how to get a cat out of a tree, not how to retrieve a cat.

But there is no longer a "cat" in the tree, I could also go up and retrieve the corpse afterwards since now it'll be less inclined to scratch me.

True, then semantically I am also correct to say that if I kill the cat and get it out of the tree, I'd be getting the cat out of the tree, since it could be called a dead cat.

In fact, I'm correct even if it'd only be correct to call it a corpse, because once the cat is dead, and is now a corpse, there would no longer be a cat in a tree.

Also a dead cat. Arguing semantics is silly.

How does one know if they are in fact a dumb motherfucker? If the standard is that a dumb motherfucker will think a smart motherfucker is crazy, then does that make any motherfucker who sounds crazy a smart motherfucker? If that is the case, then how do we know the motherfuckers locked up in insanity wards aren't actually geniuses and we're all just dumb motherfuckers? To take it one step further, what of the actual crazy motherfuckers? How do we actually identify them, assuming we have the smart motherfuckers, and the dumb motherfuckers figured out based on this standard, of smart motherfuckers sounding crazy to dumb motherfuckers.

Does it have to be alive?

Note: at the time I asked this question, the debate was titled "Does anyone have any ideas on how to get a cat out of a tree?" which is the prompt I am responding to.

I object to the assumption that she must be bored

Well if you're choosing a leader whom we know is corrupt and in it for luxury, then you'll be seeing this debate very one sided. As the question asks," is the leader of every terrorist/freedom fighter yadda yadda" with the option I proposed the answer is, not really.

They are living better lives than those who do the fighting, but those who do the fighting are either dying, or living in trenches and barracks, not a great upgrade needs to be made to live a better life than that.

As for why they are not living an equally horrible life (out their on the field) is because they are the leaders. They are valued higher, and must be kept safer, and less stressed to make the battle decisions for those with the physical ability to carry out.

False dichotomy, I did not use the term 'high' I used the term 'strung out'.

Also, the video proves that at least at one point he was high. Higher off the ground even that the officer if I'm remembering correctly, when he climbed the pole.

Check and mate.

What was he strung out on?

I can probably run faster than any tub of lard that's pissed I called her on her health problems. I'm a male, so that makes this generalization false.

Most people don't want to admit they are wrong, so arguing with anyone really would prove to be a nit picking battle of whoever feels like saying how they feel the longest.

Another reason I feel is true, is that most people on here don't actually read other's arguments.

Thanks, that was a good laugh.

Probably scoping it out to see if leaving is the best option. If he is still here, I say don't leave. Getting into a huffy over some ignorant, annoying users is silly, since nothing they say actually matters anyway.

If he's not, then Whoo party hard, I never liked that guy ;)

That's bigoted towards the the nutcracker.

I, as a dancer born in a humans body, am appalled to see that people still exist like this in the world. I have a fiery soul, sending burning passion through my veins, and I need to let it out. If you can't accept that, then get of the stage because it's my time to shine.

Feminism. What is it really? It's the promotion of women's rights, with little consideration given to men's rights, to make women and men equal. This was the case when it was first thought up as an idea, when men actually had more rights than women.

Feminism was needed back before the several amendments making us equal were put into place, and laws were made to prevent unequal treatment.

This is a horrible Photoshop, the head looks unnaturally attached to the body.

Not much is applicable outside of sex?

Get married, and you'll learn from sex, how to knock a few strokes off your golf game ;)

That joke was terrible, I apologize.

How to have sex...

This is weak. I understand logical to a fault, and trying to discourage troll posts, by using logic to a fault, but the idea that hard can only relate to a texture, is literally myopic.

I really hate to say, I agree with Joe. Replace hard, with difficult and try again please.

That last joke is hilarious, but I wanted to say he didn't ruin his parent's marriage, he was a kid when his father ruined it with lies and cheating, the kid was just a sorta clever but mostly dumb kid who took advantage of an opportunity.

Isthisthetacticjoeusesonthissite

So you agree! :) Glad i could convince you to the correct way of thinking. Pleasure debating with you.

I don't know where, but I know I saw this before. As I read the debate title, my mind imagined the images that would be here. They were the same.

The noun usage is derived from the verb usage. Two halves are plural, even thought they are apart of one whole.

The sandwich part, is being pressed between two other people or things. It may be one solid slice, but it is pressed between the two halves that extend out. You can sandwich a hotdog between two halves of bun or bread.

So now I ask, where is that definition assured?

Congrats you proved that slices of bread make a sandwich. When do you plan on proving that food stuffed between two bread halves is not a sandwich. I am pretty certain (not using sarcasm, I didn't re read my own argument so I'm not 100% certain) that I asked, what rule of sandwiches states that the slices must be separate?

According to what law, do the sandwich slices have to be separated?

The picture I showed you, is the traditional way to cut a subway sandwich.

Want to add anything new to your argument? I showed you how it does, and an example of one. The definition of sandwich, is pressed between two.(basically). If food (namely a hotdog or some salami) is sandwiched between two halves of bread, to say it's not a sandwich is just denying the definition, and is wrong.

Actually, it does matter....Subs are sandwiches anyways.

Not always

If that were the case vibrators would never had been invented, or marketed technically.

Same for a sub.

I never though it was not. If a submarine sandwich is a sandwich, then a hotdog is too.

I just wound't feel comfortable calling a hotdog (on a bun obviously) a sub. It feels weird.

Climbing a mountain alone. Risk of falling added to the heart attack and no possibility of anyone coming to your aid, because at least when playing charades someone could see you and could realize the issue.

I'd argue that if people know you suck as an actor, or have previously not acted out the heart attack scene so well, that when you suddenly act it out very well it'd raise a red flag, however I get the humor.

Can you automatically assume a person is stupid anytime after immediately?

Maybe not a fix, but it's a good enough band-aid.

DO I have to buy the phone or the jeans, or will they just be sent to me?

Because if I can just get an iPhone, sure I'll take it. It'd be fun for a few weeks what with all the gadgets and apps. Plus skinny jeans suck, whether you have a big phone or not. Try putting your wallet in there.

However, I'm choosing this side because I'm assuming I Have to actually go and buy it. This side would be way cheaper.

What if my problem is that I have too much free time?

7¾ years.

Whatever they are offering, real or fake, people are willing to buy it. The capitalist way dictates, if people will buy it, sell it.

Holy shit, three pyramids, managed to form a triangle on a map! It must be the work of the Illuminati.

Spider-Man has been in that position.

He's the worst example to bitch about provocative or flexible poses, he's constantly seen contorting in ways you'd expect female characters to. His signature pose (like when all the heroes stand around and look bad ass) is normally showing off his flexibility and acrobatics. He's rarely seen standing pround and heroic like maybe Captain America or Wolverine.

Honestly, just Google image Spider-Man, or even better Spider-Man pose, and count off the ratio of gender stereotypical 'male' poses and 'female' poses.

Typical Joe...

Woah, is this recent? I just read about Joan Rivers going.

In the song "some Nights" by Fun at This point in the song, he says

"When I hear songs, they sound like this one [so come on]"

The mistake that it's often written as is

"When I hear songs, they sound like a swan [so come on]"

Well you explained the other issue and how you'd fix it, I was just wondering if you'd explain how you'd fix this issue.

I'd probably do what I always do....seeing as God probably doesn't exist.

What about burning to death from constant sun exposure? Or what happens to the nocturnal creatures?

A lot of atheists would ask if he was who he say he is. Some militant atheists would troll him. Some people changed into atheists would block him. Some people from other religions would troll/block him. Some of his followers would now be following him on facebook.

He'd probably say 'deep' things and get tons of likes on his comments.

Do you mean misanthropist?

These sides are independent of one another. Most people actually are sheep, that would probably steal if it wasn't illegal, and would probably kill if it wasn't a sin. I, independent of them, however do not.

I've begun building a 150x150x40 castle wall in minecraft. It's going to be two layers thick so that means for whatever that equals, it's going to be double that. I've completely finished the outside walls, the inside actually will be less now that I think about it.

Way more productive than me, at least that's tangible.

I prefer being single because I'm a person with almost all negative thoughts on humanity. I'm anti social to say the least.

This side...

You've make shifted a problem (just like apple) and created a solution all in one. Now we wait for it to take off.

Took me a second to realize I have to say that is nifty but, it would present a problem for mainstream photography. Pictures are regularly taken rectangular.

Goolge porn, it's more direct and way more numerous.

Ha, same here about number 5. But yea the last debate I had with her is why I believed it to be emotionally charged instead of just anger. Her whole debating style is emotionally charged, even if it's not always anger.

This is absolutely great, I wish I could refer some of my debating enemies to this. All of my enemies are those who don't debate according to this criteria.

Number 5 should read, avoid emotionally charged responses though. Though I admit, I'd still be guilty of not following that one on occasion.

Hence the reason I prefer perspective debates, and would love to see for/against debates with multiple side choices.

Oh. That I did not know.

Do the English even drink iced tea? Isn't that like heresy or something?

Hot tea to warm you up after drenching yourself in ice.

Or isn't "perfect", or doesn't "exist".

idk

The no excuses guy!

RIP in piece.

Unless you get a cop looking for trouble.

It just might be the end... for humanity. What's so bad about that though, I've been waiting on the matrix to happen for literally ever.

Everything is under the scope of comedy, and nothing is off limits. The moment you say, these things are okay to pick fun at, but those things over there are not, you are over valuing or under valuing one or more things. It's like how people say we shouldn't make handicapped or disabled jokes. If we joke on everyone we consider normal, why can't we joke on these people? The answer is because we don't feel they are normal.

Also, it's not like he's going to care. First he's dead, second he was a comedian, and a raunchy one at that.

Fuck off and die, either everything is funny or nothing is.

Be this psed or be this her own cry for attention, you are discriminating by saying "these jokes can be funny but these jokes over here can not"

"He who sacrifices comedy for political correctness, deserves neither"

---Martin Skywalker Picard III

It's odd how her teeth grew but she didn't. It's also odd to see the rings on her finger, that it almost looks like she's too big for!

As far as sex goes, I wouldn't but I'm sure that's someone's fetish.

I do both... I squirt a blot of ketchup on my fries, then I dip the ones that didn't get squirted on, in the large blot.

It's a hot chick.

I'm going to have to go with no. I'm also going to have to say that if you feel it does, you probably didn't know who you were, and let art fill that role.

I ask you this. Have you ever went to peel a banana and it didn't tear, but instead it may have smashed your banana a little on the inside? If So, then you'll understand why at the very least the idea to open a banana from toe other end is actually a good one. As for the rest of that stuff, yea a little silly.

It took until the blood covered interview for me to realize this was satire for certain.

I found Osama Bin Laden

All I see is that the striped sign is a little taller on one side, it was probably broken or something.

What bird? Where?

I don't get it.

What do you mean suddenly they start texting?

Does the phone just slide out of their pocket and into their hands making them press buttons?

He IS a joke.

Another hilarious thing to hear, could you please message me about more of your dietary customs, or particularly ones you know about as being different than U.S./British. I'm fascinated by the differences.

Nothing negative meant by this, but just as a person's who's used to seeing this kind of food, and even assuming it was normal every where, this comment of yours is both hilarious and eye opening.

Question though: Have you ever eaten french fries, potato chips, or a doughnut?

These are all fried foods (excluding the doughnut, which is sometimes baked, but I digress). What you are seeing is a chicken breast, covered in bread crumbs and egg batter, then fried to give it a crunchy feel, like fries, or chips (oddly enough, not at all like doughnuts, go figure)

I'm some sort of nihilist. I don't believe you have to do anything because I don't believe it matters.

or because he's not supernatural

I like this

I googled it and realized, one wouldn't be interested in me because I had to google it. Especially considering context clues in the word, very heavily point to what it means.

Not denying it, but they are also taking responsibility, actively trying to fix it. Have you heard of Solar Roadways?

As a non vegan I don't see the issue. I see the steak as a higher tier of meat, above the burger. Asking which is the steak would be my asking what's a higher tier version of a common and regular veggie that you may grow tired of, since it's cheap.

As for the woman and man in a relationship question, when I think it (because I'd never ask such a personal question) it's my idea, albeit a sexist one, of who the more dominating body in the relationship, as men are more commonly seen and represented in the world as leaders of their relationship and of course the sex. Hence the reason, when a woman is more dominant in a relationship it's common to hear that "she wears the pants in the relationship". In that case, the pants, a clothing object regularly attributed to dominance and males is being worn by the female, making her dominant and thus the guy in her own relationship.

In conclusion it's not right but it makes some sense, the question "Who's the guy in the relationship".

You have the right to be, and to exclaim that you are... but little more.