Nope, I think we should have ''W.A.S.P.S.'' heritage month.
''White Anglo Saxon protestants'' were the group of innovative, self reliant settlers who pioneered America and whose modern day descendants continue to provide the knowhow and drive which maintains the country's leading position in the league of nations.
The Hispanic parasitic gangsters should be herded back to the shitholes from whence they came.
Most of history already taught in schools is "white history", from the French Revolution to the Kings and Queens of England to German super power and wars. The American Indian culture is slowly being wiped out, their beliefs and culture are being lost to time with the death of the elders. Much of it was forgotten as their ancestors were made to assimilate to the whims of the settlers and still today their lands are being taken from them. People who aren't a part of their culture but are claiming to "honor" them are desecrating their sacred mountains, ignoring their wishes and spiritual beliefs in favor of being famous.
I would love to see a month honoring them, celebrating their heritage and teaching people of their culture.
I'm still waiting for you to point out where I said it was offensive. American Indian month would be a focus simply on the American Indians. That does not equate to being offended. So again, I'll wait.
Only ones offended are Indians who are Caucasian yet you don't support White Heritage month. So then you don't support Indians. What twisted thoughts you Democrats have.
So you're a Democrat? Because you sure as hell are twisting thoughts. You can't even point out where I said I was offended so instead you try to pull out a convoluted and nonsensical smoke screen.
American Indian Heritage month would focus solely on American Indian culture. Not European heritage, not French heritage or German heritage (all of which would and could fall under Caucasian or White heritage) but solely -that means only- American Indian. It's a specific focus of one peoples culture(s), not a broad view of all White history...which is already mostly taught in schools.
Bless your heart. Keep trying. I never denied it, it's just a moot observation and I did address it in the second to last post. Here, I'll help you.
"American Indian Heritage month would focus solely on American Indian culture. Not European heritage, not French heritage or German heritage (all of which would and could fall under Caucasian or White heritage) but solely -that means only- American Indian. It's a specific focus of one peoples culture(s), not a broad view of all White history...which is already mostly taught in schools."
You've called me a Democrat. You're wrong but let's play with this.
You've accused me of being offended about a White Heritage month. I've asked you repeatedly to show me where I said that. You still can't and haven't.
You can't seem to comprehend that I am talking about honoring a specific group within an ethnicity vs. an entire ethnic group. Even though it's been repeated over and over, it falls on either your reading comprehension being lacking or you just don't care enough to actually read before you make a wrong assumption or attempt some twisted thought process to completely misunderstand or misrepresent what's being said.
When you can't back up what you accuse me of you try to throw up a smoke screen instead of admitting you were wrong.
If you think that Democrats have convoluted, twisted thinking, you have shown a remarkable example of how you believe Democrats to be. Bravo Sir. I believe you are a Democrat.
Any type of month promoting "heritage" in my idea is stupid, as it's saying that some ethnicities should be held in higher honor of others. There's so many ethnicity groups, Europeans, Hispanics, African, Asian, American, etc, that it's impossible to celebrate all cultures. Heritage should be celebrated, but all at once. Not for a month and only for a certain group.
