Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day

ChadOnSunday's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of ChadOnSunday's arguments, looking across every debate.

"You're insane . . . . ."

Yay for synonyms!

Oral sex is also oral sex

Anal sex is also anal sex

Sex is also sex

And "intercourse" is:

1: connection or dealings between persons or groups

2: exchange especially of thoughts or feelings : communion

3: physical sexual contact between individuals that involves the genitalia of at least one person ; especially : sexual intercourse 1

So if "consummation" requires "intercourse," and "intercourse" includes any kind of sex involving the junk, one can use oral or anal sex to consummate a marriage.

The definitions are very clear. Pity there's so many of them, and they so often contradict one another.

I did look at MW and apparently you are just making this shit up:

1: connection or dealings between persons or groups

2: exchange especially of thoughts or feelings : communion

3: physical sexual contact between individuals that involves the genitalia of at least one person ; especially : sexual intercourse 1

So not only does "intercourse" have different meaning than the sexual one, but the sexual one specifically references oral and anal sex and being a type of intercourse.

Nice try, joe.

ChadOnSunday(1863) Clarified
5 points


Sexual intercourse


Anal sex

Oral sex

Vag on vag sex

It doesn't seem like it's really a very complicated connection to make.

Anyways, mainly I just wanted to say I don't think you'd be bringing this issue up if some war vet paralyzed from the waist down (including his penis) got married after his tour.

Haha actually what am I saying... you of all people just might do that.

Yes I do XD

ChadOnSunday(1863) Clarified
1 point

I stop participating in debates when it becomes evident it is no longer about anything other than getting the last word in. I've been there done that with you before, joe.

Because he's too busy trying to turn this site into a reddit/uberhumor hybrid.

Hahaha just kidding. Well no he is actually trying to do that, but he does also occasionally engage in serious debate. Occasionally. We just got into it in a real debate over gay marriage.

Haha I should've known all I had to do was include more women and less "offensive" comparisons to the black civil rights movement to get my point through to you.

Despite your assertions about the point of language being to cut down on ambiguity we don't really use it at all like that in situations like these, and like the example she gave. And in the "offensive" examples I gave.

I understand the confusion. When people say they are pro choice, they mean they like the ability to make choices and keep making choices. Despite how it sounds, pro-choice actually refers to more than one choice; ultimately the ability to choose to run your sex life however you choose. I could see how anti-choice advocates may think pro-choicers may just make their one choice in life and then be content to let the government make all subsequent choices for them - but I'll be damned they just keep wanting to make their own decisions.

I buy it when I see his third arm or at very least see him glow in the dark.

The study doesn't say who is shooting all these black people, so we can't ban any particular race for that reason. For all you know it's the Hispanics and Asians shooting all the blacks.

And suicide should be legal. You should be allowed to end your life. And you should be able to end your life how you want to, within reason. But frankly shooting yourself at home is much cleaner for society than, say, jumping off a tall building.... splat! So I don't think we should ban guns because one particular race or another is frequently killing themselves with guns. Because in addition to suicide being permissible, it's also not like shooting yourself is the only way to end your life. People will find other ways if they are committed to killing themselves.

Conservatives usually can't even tell when they themselves are gay. The Bible Belt, for example, is bursting with repressed homosexuality. What makes you think they would be good at detecting it in others?

I've lived with 9 cats and 3 dogs over the course of my life but never once lived in a house where anyone did the tp under, and we never had a problem because we left the dangly bit on top of the roll when we were done. Cats and dogs will go at that shit if anything is hanging off any which way, front or back, it doesn't matter. That's why you leave it on top, out of their line of sight.

There's a dick tucked under a designer skirt on every page of Cosmopolitan if you know where to look. Lots of overly-feminine female models are actually men; why shouldn't women be allowed the same freedom?

From a musical perspective they should really be using proper grammar, here. It wouldn't mess up the flow and would simultaneously make them seem like semi-literate, semi-educated individuals.

In 5 years that chick is going to have the most unattractive rack, ever. She clearly already has breast implants, and over time her breasts will continue to grow (more so if she gets pregnant at any time) and sag. Pretty soon her tits are something you're actively trying to avoid looking at as opposed to uncontrollably staring at. Better to pick women with a small to normal sized rack, that way once age and pregnancy set in you end up with a girl like the rack in the picture and you already had a girl with a nice pair to begin with.

Sorry to go on that shallow rant on the physical appearance of women, but I've never understood the male infatuation with massive boobs. They don't look particularly flattering from the get go (out of a bra, anyways), and over time they start to look quite terrible. My general rule is if they are too much for me to handle with one hand, they're too damn big.

NOTE TO THE WORLD: The anus is for exit, not entree (entering)! :)

You notice nobody ever turns down a blowjob on the basis that "that's not what your mouth is designed to do," yet for some reason that argument (essentially) is so often used to justify not trying/doing anal.

I guess I can agree so long as we can also agree there's a right and wrong way to be straight. Wasted bros who take their shirts off at house parties and flex in the living room in a shameless attempt to attract women, for example. Dirty bops who go out dressed like prostitutes are another good example. Ever been to a rave or a frat party? Give em a shot if you ever wanna see people being straight in all the wrong ways.

Personally I've only ever said "no" to drugs I've already tried... you never know if you're gonna like something until you try it. Same logic my parents used to get me to eat disgusting sprouts now applied to drug use.

I always use my normal voice with babies. Not with pets, but with children I think it helps them mature and learn their language faster. My cat is never going to learn English, so I don't think I'm fucking that up for him when I baby-talk at him.

You're debates are still uncannily easy to identify as joecavalry debates. Someones bitching about iPhones? Must be ones of joe's debates.

I wouldn't be particularly fond of looking like I'm 50 when I'm really 20.

And I'm not a health freak, but living in an age where a slight cut on your finger meant painful infection and a horrible death, or where the common cold had a 100% fatality rate doesn't appeal to me, either.

I spend most of my time on Google earth looking for chicks who went out to sunbathe topless at the wrong time. Good to know you're doing something more productive with the program; espionage.

ChadOnSunday(1863) Clarified
1 point

I've dated both vegetarians and vegans... their food related beliefs never impaired them in that area.

Though I used to give them shit for it.

But hey, gotta get your protein, somehow.

1 of 7 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]