Kite626's Waterfall
That's a contradictory statement. If to save the life of a polar bear, and denying the natural cause of death is selfish. That also must indicate that eating animals for food is as selfish. They die from an unnatural death. I also don't understand how it can be selfish when we're not polar bears. It still makes no sense to say self-serving. It creates contradictory towards your statement yet again, isn't the eating of an animal self serving of ones self as well?
It's probably caused by the obvious reason of population, and competitiveness. They grow up competing whether it's a gang war, or who makes more money. In return this makes them more out spoken. They want to benefit themselves because they desire too choose.
The greatest division in mankind, is economical slavery from debt. The puppeteer behind the whip towards society would be the major banking industries. Produced and originated by people such as Rockefeller, etc. Money, is in fact enslavement. Money is created through debt, for it is loaned. Once distributed it creates more promises on repayment. No debt = No value within money. Once this debt is created, a society will be created as well. We form industries, jobs and more, therefore economical enslavement is created. Once these foundations are in place society lives through it. "There is two ways to conquer the world. One by sword, the other debt."
In a debate aspect i would say; what is randomness. All statements or ideals inquired and expressed to another is random. It may not seem that way in an individual mind set. Although any conversation is brought up through someones thought, to the other it's random. In an wtf aspect, it's highly impressive. He's not hitting is legs with one another, that takes a lot of coordination o.O!
Death is highly beneficial. Although, i do disagree with your reasoning. Even if it was to decrease the population of lower i.q humans, there will always be a balance. "Good," "evil," etc. If we were to lose those with lower mentalities someone else would just fill their role in this life. I think death is highly great, do to the fact we're already highly overpopulated. Without death this world would be more chaotic then it already is. This is also why i think Hitler was beneficial towards society.
What exactly would be a beneficial solution? Any path you decide to take to solve a problem will always be a journey, but the journey itself is irrelevant. The solutions you receive from any journey will always have a different solution from one another. Who's to know which way is best, but in my opinion, as long as you move forward and survive day to day then all else is irrelevant you succeeded just by moving forward into the next day.
Wrong, you have the most potential for learning growing up. Older people have already reached their peek of how far they can go on most things. Also humans adapt for survival, the young generation adapts to the thinking style of the old and realizes why they do the things they do, and than we choose ours. I think young people are more intellectual.
It's quite wise of you to acknowledge bias upon your want. Actually it's not about thinking what should or shouldn't; we are living and we are with a head placed upon your shoulders, i don't find it to be illegal to sleep. Just avoid becoming nocturnal like me.
The question doesn't ask what type of god is it, nor did it ask his abilities it simply asked whether or not he created atheists. It doesn't bother me i find it odd that you don't realize i answered a question i didn't feel like stating my own beliefs while you on the other hand dispute the flaws of why my opinion isn't concrete due to the fact of me not having substantial evidence of what kind he is and what he can do. If i was to go into that type of depth i would merely say he is a god who created life and let it play out on it's own.
That his highly unlogical, that statement you have established nothing, him having an unlimited amount of powers means that it could be a probability that you yourself isn't typing right now it's him forcing you to do so, and you walking isn't truly you it's him controlling your nervous system. Rather disputing my opinion of the question why not answer the question for yourself? So riahlize, Did god create atheists?
I don't know i truly know nothing only mere assumption, but if i was to enter the debate with the thought of him not creating humans i would have just said no god didn't create atheists due to the fact that he didn't create humans. The question "Did god create atheists," implicates that he created humans why ask a question about humanitie's creations if you think god didn't create humans, the asker would have immediately known that he didn't create atheism i'm basing my response upon the question not my beliefs. I have no need of using bias oppinions to answer a question someone has with a different idealistic mind.
Let's say there is a god, even then he didn't create atheism he may have created humans, but humans having their own minds have made the decision to form an idealistic thought that their is no god. That's like saying god created grills, or that he created pills. so no...
