AveSatanas's Waterfall
This argument is based off of the assumption that Liberalism breeds political correctness which absolutely isnt true. There is NOTHING liberal about safe spaces, trigger warnings, and political correctness. They are psuedoliberal values that SJWs use and theyre unfairly attributed to liberalism. A real liberal doesnt care what is politically correct or not because a real liberal values the first amendment right to free speech above all else. So a real liberal is going to value someones right to say whatever harmful ignorant shit they want over someones "right" to not be offended.
No. Right now 40% of all gun purchases are made between buyers and private sellers meaning that there is no background check on the buyer. There are so many loopholes and ways to get a gun without any significant background check.
Never once has he said this. Also, considering there's no winner take all the delegates are proportionally distributed by the vote. So there's no grievance to be had.
Yeah I figured I'd roll on through CD. It grew stagnant for a while but things seem to be picking up. Swag
Civilization was intelligently designed. By us. But just because we can intelligently design doesn't mean we were designed ourselves
It says the right to BARE arms. This isnt the person baring the firearm its the drone. And drones arent US citizens and dont have constitutional rights. Logik'd
Right just like abstinence is a sex position that doesn't involve intercourse.
Us lacking belief in god doesn't negate that we have active arguments against religion as well as reasons to combat it moron.
I know its a joke but on a serious note:
The human brain looks for appearances before anything else. Its what draws you in to investigate the person and socialize with them. If you then continue to date them afterwards solely for their looks yeah its kinda shallow. But if you get hooked by their looks then learn that you like other things about them then its just a perk.
Sure life would adapt if the change was over a longer span of time than is predicted. The climate is changing so rapidly that nothing can adapt fast enough to survive it. At least not most things, other species of plants and animals might be better suited to increased climate.
Because you can't posit a god unless you prove it exists and you can't say it caused evolution until you prove it did. Also because it says nothing of it in the bible, the basis of the entire religion. I'm not saying the bible is true but if you can't at least back your beliefs up with that then saying god caused evolution is the equivalent of being pulled out of your ass.
its true its just a joke lol. but evolution is actually true .
Social security was only one of the many programs put in place by FDR to get america out of the great depression...and they worked. Also you never gave information on the context of these changes or who they were made by, For all we know FDR put these great programs into place that were later altered by Republicans or was a mutual agreement between democrats and republicans. and lets not forget FDR wasnt really a democrat. He sided with them to get himself to the top but he actually ran pretty independently on his own "bull moose" party. Also reguardless of the past we have to look at what both parties have to offer TODAY and its clearly the democrats. I personally think both sides pretty much suck and that this bipartisan shit is killing progress and killing america but if i had to choose id choose the side that didnt shut the government down in a hissy fit and who is comprised of people who dont think noahs ark is a true story and that satan, abortion, and gay marriage are real threats to america....
*you're. Also I hardly care for being a bigot against a group that is bigoted against every other religion, atheists, gays, pro choice advocates, secularists, pro separation of church and state advocates, "evolutionists", and anyone who masturbates.
Well duh I know in reality the bible is a collection of different people's opinions. But provided god is real and actually said all these things then he is an asshole
Besides, there's no evidence of Him directly saying "Yeah, you can go rape people; you know, burn some witches too. Oh, and while you're at it, why don't you enslave some people?"
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT) god's punishment for rape is to have the victim marry the attacker and a petty fine. Awesome. Also there are many passages where god tells the Israelites to take the young women of other nations as their own. Also it's not in the 10 commandments despite it being nearly as heinous as murder.
(Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT) god literally explains who you can enslave. Later on Jesus tells slaves to obey their masters and god lays out the appropriate way to beat your slave to avoid punishment. Slavery is clearly condoned.
Exodus 22:18 thou shalt not suffer a sorceress to live/witch to live. Pretty obvious...
So yes he actually does point them out verbatim.
Provided it is THE Yaweh of Christianity this being would have flooded the world, caused sin, demanded sacrifice, condoned rape, condoned slavery, condoned witch hunting, created an unjust system of petty crime for infinite punishment, did nothing during the holocaust, 911, ect in the name of so called free will, and created a universe that appears in every way shape and form to be the product of natural processes when investigated down to the deepest level while also providing zero evidence for his existence yet demanding our unwavering devotion to him. In otherwords: an asshole.
Because we have polar oppsite viewpoints in a very critical debate question that plagues the minds of all humanity .
Yes spreading any false information is ultimately harmfull for any person or society in general. However this brand of delusion in particular carries especially harmfull characteristics such as general hatred of human nature, and disreguard for the value of human opinion, creation, thought, and even life by extension. Yes. teaching it as true is harmfull
Clearly. A child who's brain has not yet matured enough to have strong or even existent critical thinking skills will accept anything it's told on the spot with no evidence required. This is how religion survives. It feeds on the kids who are unable to mentally circumvent its traps
Not necessarily the strongest. Just those that fit best in their niche .
The fact that theres no evidence for it whatsoever and it presupposes an unfalsifiable fairy tale?
New xbox, baltimore ravens fleece, clothes, a watch, 90$, tons of gift cards, candy, old spice, and an iphone. I'm a spoiled fuck
"Intelligent" has a nice ring to it. Uh...I mean don't call me thaat cmoonn guys.
Well not all laughs are equal as not all jokes are equal. You see, conservative humor and liberal humor is very different. Like comparing the clever humor of dmitri Martin and Anthony jesselnick (my opinion) and their dry humor to, say, a 3rd grader making armpit farts. Armpit fart style jokes are easy to make and that is why conservatives have run up a high number on the metric laugh meter. Liberal comedy often takes longer to craft, usually needing a story of somekind to lead into the elaborate punchline, so they cannot tell as many. So what we see is at a distance conservatives look funnier by sheer numbers compared to liberals but the liberal joke quality to laugh ratio is far higher with an astounding 156.88 chuckleunits per joke. And the strange thing is, most liberal jokes have conservative punchlines.
For instance: knock knock-"who's there?"- bill o' rilley, can you tell me how the tides go in an out?
See? Comedy gold
I've studied comedyology for years, I know my stuff.
for a no life, no good, yella bellied, cotton pickin, chickin pluckin, moon shinin, gater wrastlin, towel head, sand monkey, cock goblin, horn dog!
