Your expressing an opinion (your opinion) about your god.
As Joe said, the other gods also have people who believe in them.
Then there's those pesky atheists who believe in no god.
Point is saint, it's all opinions and no one has any proof. Just faith or logic.
And that's the truth.
Who's to say GW would be a bad thing. Hell Canada could become a warm, sunny paradise all the way to the north pole.
Or thermal energy production could save us all from dwindling fossil fuel supplies. We could farm pineapples in Norway. Rednecks could live comfortably in Alaska. Can't be all bad -- right?
You seem to be unable to come up with direct answers and more importantly examples to illustrate your claims. This is not surprising, given that there really aren't any. Your thinking runs along with the liberal notion that government is the solution to social inequities. This is your opinion and your certainly entitled to it. I would recommend however that you not try debating it, since there are no facts that support it. It was interesting talking with you. Thank you.
There are of course conservatives who are not Christian, as well as liberals who are Christians. I believe we are discussing liberals -vs- conservatives rather than religion. Come up with an actual point in purely conservative ideology that you find to be an archaic custom, which prevents people from thinking for themselves.
Government providing accommodation.
Why is it the purview of government to accommodate individuals who have tried and failed. You must realize that a handout is very different from a hand up. Be specific about the accommodation you are proposing.
Governments have been getting more liberal Yes they do tend that way. You said earlier that there is some "later step" in which the role of liberal governments reduce. I have NEVER seen liberal government programs do anything other than expand. Please offer just one example of this reduction happening.
The kind of things conservatism is about supporting.
OK ------- for instance what?
If you don't play, then you lose nothing. They can decide to not try - the decision isn't forced. Your earlier statement said that liberals want to help those who try and fail. Again ---- what is the nature of that help?
That'd be part of some later step, when the role of government be reduced. (It leads to minarchism.) Please offer an actual example of a liberal government that has shrunk.
I sense confusion. You propose that individuals think for themselves, yet you want government to increase control in their lives. What are these archaic customs that are preventing people from thinking for themselves? You speak of individuals who fail at the task. What of the ones who never try, how are they to be helped? You say that some are kind and want to help. Why must government be the agent of that help, rather than individuals?
Liberals are all about SOCIAL JUSTICE. There is no emphasis on personal responsibility, but rather simply on social equality. You can be lazy, shiftless, irresponsible and "the victim" and society still owes you a free ride. There is little to be found of manliness in such an outlook.
Here is another example. In this case artificial selection by C-section causes a group to increase.
The guys on Negan's team do not appear happy, secure nor well adjusted to their situation. When the end of Negan comes, it will be at the hands of his own followers. Fear and intimidation are powerful motivators, but there's always some brave soul that screws it up.
His appearance has changed in the same way even great presidents have over the years. What is different with Obama is that he earned his gray and wrinkled countenance by trying to bring down our power and influence in the world. He mocks any who dare criticize his policies. He turns his back on people who are struggling for their freedom (See Iran, Egypt, Jordan, Libya, Crimea). He doubled our nations debt.
He has had to live with that ill tempered, ugly women for all these years. Anybody with all that on his shoulders would look like shit too.
You don't win the culture war by being stubborn.
Actually that's quite correct. The culture war is being won on many fronts. Election of conservative officials by tens of millions of conservative voters is a significant indicator of direction the pendulum is moving.
Just because the Republicans don't want to change doesn't mean they are winning.
Change is not synonymous with improvement. I'll wager that Obama might object if this transgender boy wanted to use the girls shower in the posh private school that his daughters attend. 😳
Our politicians shouldn't even be elected based on some of these issues.
Our politicians are elected by voters to represent the concerns of voters. Exactly where is this not to your liking?
I always thought that A-rab bad guys used those long curvy bladed swords. These clowns in the news look like A-rab ninjas with knives they bought from L.L. Bean. And since when are A-rabs into vests? Those went out in the 70's dint they. The best way to deal with these folks is to get them real jobs. They seem adept at farming (Opium) so make them pig farmers. Or we could just bomb them back into th 14th century, where they'd fit in nicely.
Wow those images were beautiful. But seriously :
There are enough of us in each generation who seem to be inclined to keeping our ass covered with our pants, and our eyes focused on the possibilities, to warrant reasonable optimism for our future.
If we can also manage to avoid extinction at the hands of the (EBC) exposed butt-crackers, then one day we will at last set off to become one with the Force.
2013 102 officers killed in the line of duty
2014 126 officers killed in the line of duty
2015 86 officers killed in the line of duty in only 7 months.
The ten year average is one officer killed every 60 hours.
At what point do you suggest we say too many?
Note: These officers are from all races.
I could not care less how many bad guys are shot and killed by police, except to say "not enough".
Hint: There many more bad guys than police, so put put that in your percentages and get a clue.
If your in a gas station in Texas, the individual needing a warning IS the police.
Or
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/
Or
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/
Joe, this sounds like a tax the rich question. How much is too much. What percentage should the rich pay.
IMO there should be a consumption tax on everything you buy except food, healthcare and education. Everyone pays this tax at the same rate on any purchase. This should replace the income tax.
Certainly perspective can effect perception. Your graphic illustrates that optical perception is a particularly effective way to trick our brains.
Truth and perception are not the same thing.
The truth is that the shadow on the left does have the shape of a square. If you realize that you are viewing a shadow, yet ignore the possibility of the possible shapes that can generate such a shadow, you are in truth, an idiot.
-
The true nature of a thing is, however unaffected by your perception if it.
If your perception of reality is not accurate, and you don't understand that, you are an idiot.
-
Take for example the $15.00 min. wage in Seattle. If you percieved that is would raise a significant number of people out of poverty ------- your an idiot.
The whole idea began as police departments were told to not ask the immigration status of people reporting crimes in their communities.
In other words, "We won't check to see if your a criminal if you'll just tell is about other criminals"
Not exactly a good idea to begin with.
Then some liberal thinkers decided to institutionalize the notion by passing city ordinances openly directly law enforcement officials to selectively enforce certain laws for certain people. Hmmmmm
Agnes was not only pissed of, but deeply confused as well. Capitalism has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. It has raised the standard for nations across the world. It is without question the engine of prosperity. Agnes has failed to find her place in an ocean of opportunity.
So that's our fault?
2009 - 192 governments convene for the UN climate summit in Copenhagen with expectations of a new global agreement high; but they leave only with a controversial political declaration, the Copenhagen Accord.
2010 - Developed countries begin contributing to a $30bn, three-year deal on "Fast Start Finance" to help them "green" their economies and adapt to climate impacts.
http://www.debatingeurope.eu/2014/09/26/
Remember how all the nations keep meeting in these much heralded global summits to take action against GW? Remember what it always boils down to? How the rich nations are pressured to donate hundreds of billions to developing countries? How every time the smelly turd of truth is thrown on the table, everyone leaves.
When sun spots are one the wain, and the oceans have finally covered the San Fernando freeway, due of course to the fools not driving enough Prius's and the ever present evil of the Republicans in general, there will at long last be an end to the bickering over GW and Nancy Pelosi can return to her solar powered house boat at the corner if Mission and Embaradaro streets on San Francisco island.
Daaaaa course onacounta it's all a lib plan to share the wealth enough to result in all the developed nations becoming economically responsible for all the underdeveloped nations. A step in the direction of the utopian world government fantasy.
Er sumthin like that
Ok then keep your fantasy about our messiah but:
Wealthy people need to pay MORE
The government build infrastructure daaa with TAX money from where?
Why more taxes --- Obama thinks Big Government is good.
Your a fine fellow too GN, but your eyes are closed to the danger our federal government has become to our freedoms.
Charity is a wonderful thing when it will help others rise out of their predicament, or lessen their hopeless suffering. Coming to the aid of those in trouble is almost instinctive for mankind.
This can not be confused with enabling foolish or destructive behavior. Greece has become the victim of a corrupt government's socialist attempts to stay in power through unrealistic promises.
An interesting twist on the notion that we transcend ourselves in some extra ordinary way. Same simple message that we are one.
All this imagining, despite the obvious truth that we are just tiny creatures crawling around on a bit of dust, in an unimaginably vast and unknowing universe.
Or something like that.
I don't know, you pick one then define a God to match. That's before "Dark Energy" became the next cool idea for science to worry with.
Evolution is nothing more than certain random mutations causing a survival advantage, or disadvantage. This enhanced survival results in more copies of the mutation represented in a population. The mutation eventually becomes dominant. At the same time other mutations are surviving better or worse than the dominant one. This process insures that mutations which increase survivablity then propagate in a population, while mutations not best suited for survival are eventually eliminated.
_
Sentience is a stage of evolutionary development that aids in the ability to survive. The ecosystem on earth shows zero evidence that sentience was here at the beginning of life on this planet.
I found it quite interesting. A clear explanation of the pitfalls of social justice ideology taken to its ultimate end.
"The real problem: a simplistic, unworkable, and ultimately stifling conception of social justice".
"When feelings become more important than issues".
IMO Joe hit on a gem of relevance this time.
Powerful leaders have infiltrated the Democratic Party and taken their ideology as a screen to hide behind. They tried calling themselves communists back in the 50s and everybody went nuts so now they're denying that name and disguisie themselves as liberals or progressives or socialists when in fact they are communists.
Don't freak out and start telling me that socialism And communism are different I know they're different. Socialism is more acceptable so they sometimes call themselves socialists. See Bernie Sanders.
Arrest and prosecution come to mind! Maybe we should start by arresting young blacks carrying CVS Pharmacy tote bags, full of new shoes.
Or we could give them all a free shot at looting the major's office. She seems ok with a little rioting and looting to relieve stress and stuff!
"Angry black man" is what he sounds like. Did you watch the videos, or just go trolling for something to jump on.
That is, unfortunately, how politics is in this country right now.
He has taken every opportunity to comment against the police, in all of these racial incidents, before the facts are known. What a punk.
The first video was excellent. An encouraging view, that you wont get from the news media. Interestingly the cell phone video showed some rioters and a large number of onlookers.
The second video made it almost seem worth it to be young again, but not quite.
There you have touched the underlying truth. The mother should be allowed to kill the baby before its born because the baby is dependent on the mother for life. Then, naturally anyone sustaining the life of the baby after birth should be allowed to kill the baby as well - right?
We can surly agree that natural selection is the mechanism that results in a species evolving toward characteristics which increase survivability. Further we can most likely agrees that these characteristics include physical strength and endurance as well as intelligence and cunning in the hunt for food. The weak and dull witted are then least well adapted to survive. If Liberals are prone to cater to the weak, it logically follows that they work against natural selection. Sooooo there ya go.