What was Jill Stein's number 1 priority campaign promise?

They have to. Ancient Greece must have had the carpets match the drapes.

To bring out that type of vicious anger means I hit a nerve of truth about you.

What makes you angry?

Let me explain something once more since your devil's advocate personality pretends to never get it.

I am not a devil's advocate. I just live by the rules that you claim you want. You never follow your own rules.

Barring inhumanity, we are all partisan to whichever side more aligns with our moral values and our politcal ideology.

Then you are a complete fucking idiot for attacking people for aligning to a political ideology.

What the Democrats are doing to Trump is not normal partisan politics.

Yes it is, you stupid fuck.

It is outright hatred for him and what he stands for

Oh no. I can't imagine what someone would sound like If they had pure hatred for the opposite ideology. Oh wait, I can, that's what you do, you stupid fuck.

Democrats stopped attacking Trump for breathing, I would have no need for my debates speaking to their total hypocrisy and double standards.

That's true, but you would still do it any way because you are a stupid fuck. Plus, only a stupid fuck would think that's the only hypocrisy of the democrats that needs to be spoken about.

the Democrat party did not support No Restriction abortions, I would not have to speak to their inhumanity towards our unborn children days from birth.

You don't try to stop pregnancy. You support more unwanted pregnancies. You are responsible for all abortions. Get off your high horse. You love abortions.

's called not suing a private Christian family owned business to cater events that go against their religious beliefs.

It is not a part of Christianity to be assholes to your fellow countrymen. They are violating their beliefs by claiming their religious beliefs say that.

It's called not appointing activist Justices to create new law forcing every State to change the marriage laws.

No law was created you stupid fuck.

It all about an arrogant activist group of elites thinking they have the right to force all Americans to think and believe as they think and believe.

You just described yourself, you stupid fuck.

When the day comes that these extremist Liberal Democrats stop trying to push their ideology down our throats, and stop supporting infanticide, you will not see me on these debate sites.

So, you fixing lied in your first argument. You stupid fuck.

So, you are completely full of shit. Congratulations on bring every fucking thing you hate. I look forward to your downvote and complaints about my language and insults. Don't learn anything, just like a stupid fucking Democrat.

I have a "bet" for you. You claim you hate when Democrats refuse to look at the facts. It is a fact that no new law was created for gay marriage. It is a very simple fact. You keep claiming a new law was created. So here is the deal: I won't attack your "arguments" as long as you don't repeat that one claim. You can keep dang all your other false statements, and I won't attack you. Let's see who can last longer.

You really have no self awareness. So, are you trying to claim that if Democrats stopped attacking Trump you would finally stop being so partisan?

When you can't dispute the facts you Progressives run and hide

The article writer thinks guns can exist with the microstamping technology. That means he isn't calling for all guns to be banned.

You left out a word, dipshit.

"No, not merely a gun owner. Don’t get all huffy and defensive, gun zealots. Nobody’s tarring all gun owners. I’ve long been one myself."

You left out a word, dipshit.

You left out a word, dipshit.

Only banning semi auto rifles isn't banning all guns.

Do you think that many people could get policies to be enacted?

She has held the position that you don't need guns to defend yourself. She then had people use guns to defend herself because she knows she needs guns to defend herself. That is hypocritical.

That's kind of scary. Imagine if 16-18% of a political party felt that only cops should have free speech.

Which right wingers here are trying to stop liberals from getting guns?

I bet a bunch of people will say they want to buy it, but the day it is actually available they will not go through with it.

Of course he is. Every time I respond to him he gets giddy and tells everyone.

Man, there is no end to the contradictions you have. This one is great because you completely discredit yourself.

You personally believe that you can't convince voters for Democrats with your truth because they refuse to hear it, but you also think that Republicans were able to change the minds of voters for Democrats. Therefore, either you are lying about telling the truth or you recognize that Republicans had to lie to won the election. But, you also believe that the only honest party in the election were the Republicans. So, either way you are a liar. Thanks man.

Are you going to put out a greatest misses album? These are gold.

Intuition: the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning.

The fact that you had to demonstrate conscious reasoning to prove your point shows that it is counter intuitive.

I speak like an ordinary person

I don't put squares in circles

Do i owe you that?

No, you owe yourself that.

You should realise, that besides religion(belief/God relationship), i also have a social life of ....ex. Philosophies, politics, profession, talent, experiences etc.

Whenever you talk about religion you are talking about your social life? Why?

I am not a programmed (100%)

religious robot

Oh, they didn't finish yet?

only talk about God relationship with fellow christians.

False.

I beg your pardon .....you are absolutely wrong.

Don't tell me what you don't know just because you think it.

Bullshit. You have never once talked about your relationship with God. You only ever talk about your relationship with man. You prove that Christianity has nothing to do with God.

Christianity is absolutely a relationship with man and not with Christ. If Jesus was or wasn't here you could sill create a religion that is just a relationship between people just like every other religion that had ever existed.

Rules being written in the Bible doesn't mean they are actually hated by God.

It would be very difficult for someone living like a Christian to Syu the things you say.

Interesting that you think it is the business of Christians to determine who is Christian. If you actually believed that you were in a relationship with God you wouldn't spend so much time on these relationships with man. And, since you are just add much of an atheist as me, there is no reason for me to back down from the conversation.

Insecurity is where you have to threaten people with Hell because they know you better than you know yourself.

I don't even get what you are saying.

Just an FYI, that's because you are dumb.

Geting caught by who?

The members of this website.

For what? to what court or prison?

The court of public opinion.

You find it insulting because you yourself are not really a Christian and you don't want to get caught.

Today's new age Liberal Christian basically makes up their own version of Christianity.

False. Every Christian in the history of the religion makes up their own version. Especially you.

Oops. Looks like I broke the chat bot.

You're

Only idiots think I am a progressive. So, do you think I am a progressive?

To all the Conservative debaters, how many times have you heard these deceptive liars deny being a Progressive, or Liberal or Democrat?

Never. The people who push that narrative admit to being Democrats. It's the people who aren't pushing that narrative that deny being Democrats.

I figured out you can't read or listen the very first time I told you that I wasn't a progressive.

You think I don't exist because I am a minority. How fucking dumb is that.

I am not a progressive ... still. If you weren't a liberal you would have been able to read that before. It is clear that you liberals can't listen either. I'll give you that one.

Cuomo made it clear to me that he was answering a question that wasn't being asked. The only way he could have done that was by not being able to read.

You don't have to read it you can listen to it !

What a coincidence. A liberal like you needs it read to you instead of reading it yourself. Thanks for proving my point.

Can you see the link in the description? He posted his source.

It's about changing the process to be more strict. As I have already pointed out to you, your entire idea of our vetting process is completely false. There are 2 issues. Whether or not we even need to improve our vetting system, and if we need to ban people until the vetting system is improved. Technically, this debate is about showing a stupid picture of a vet on a skateboard.

Unfortunately, it only shows that liberals don't know how to read.

The current vetting processes is question and a slap on the wrist. Are you a terrorist, are you going to commit a terror act, do you think of suicide, do you think of killing people, are you sick, and then the slap on the wrist to deter them from doing anything.

Not any crying process used on planet Earth.

Does that sound like a vetting process of course not

What a coincidence. A fictional vetting process doesn't sound like a vetting process.

but it is the main idea right now in the United States vetting program.

Nope, not at all. Not even close.

The banning of those 6 countries are temporary and will be allowed back when the vetting process is changed and more thorough.

It's not about the ban being temporary.

He doesn't come off as unreasonable, he comes off as wrong to liberals.

What's "aborti"?

How many rioters have you stopped?

So, you are against riots, but for vigilantes?

No, you are missing the point. What I do get is that you are an ideologue that hates the truth. Ideologues want biased media. That's how biased media ends up existing. It isn't a liberal only thing. I remember when blaming everyone else for your problems was only done by liberals. It's a shame that those times are over.

The media shifted from neutral to biased reporting because of people like you. The media changes based on its audience. When they see people take sides and ignore everything about their own side the media will change to only show one side of the story because the audience ignores the other side anyway.

I read more of the link you provided than you did.

There is no way to separate the conflict in a situation where there shouldn't be any conflict. There is no appeasing the religious right on this issue.

Normally people are arrested. This one is weird.

We don't address any of the issues with abortion in America.

The religious right is not affected at all.

Then why does God not see in 3D when you talk about Him?

I do see Christians constantly talking about Allah and they think he is fictional. If Christians couldn't get married because of the Easter Bunny they would definitely start talking about him.

I got a newsflash for you: a debate website might not be the right thing for you. ;)

What would a proper disagreement look like?

Inspiring things = making sure you are wrong?

Your case is probably a hopeless one.

Disagreeing with me = making sure you are wrong. It is getting pretty hopeless trying to get you to understand anything.

If such are your claims, then I'm not surprised to see nothing that could be called as reasoning

Someone saying they give their reasoning causes you to be less surprised that there is no reasoning given. Why? Are you that untrusting?

Though I didn't need an example, thanks anyway.

You don't understand the difference between facts and opinions.

I don't think I agreed to any such thing.

So you are trying to make sure you are wrong.

I wonder why you do.

Then read my posts. I actually give my reasoning, unlike yourself.

But then again, you like to cling

To opinions that aren't true.

But then again, you like to accuse me of the things you are guilty of.

Thanks man. I am glad you could agree that you don't inspire anything in anyone.

Only in your Hitler loving world would you be so determined to make sure you are wrong about everything.

Ha, you are so fucking dumb. The only thing that you could even remotely claim you inspire is my anger and you are too dumb to even take credit for it.

You don't inspire anything in anyone.

Congratulations. Your joke image proves there is more than 1 answer.

That's not really a great idea in your case.

You can try to sound like a conservative all you want, but it is too late for you.

How very liberal of you to propose laws for things that are already illegal.

Well, let me know when you detect what that theoretical limit is. I see no end to it.

Are you retarded? FromWithin is an admitted progressive just like you. Of course it is the progressives that are insane.

Don't you read the crazy stuff FromWithin accuse people of?

It was bad enough when you were treating gays like special sinners. Now you want to treat them like criminals. You are a truly evil person. No wonder you are a baby murderer.

Hahahaha. Good one.

Fair enough. Good point.

If it doesn't refute Darwinian evolution, it does support it in some way.

Are you hitting on me? That's fucking creepy.

Gave what away? Trump gives away that he doesn't have an IQ over 150 every time he speaks.

You just responded to yourself to ask the person you responded to if they voted for Trump. Your insanity is running wild.

Actually, the reason why liberals don't understand Trump is because every single thing out of his mouth is a lie.

Wow, you think Trump has an IQ of 156? Damn, Trump supporters are super gullible. He won because he can get idiots to believe anything.

Its easy to take things out of context and stitch together nonsense surrounding the falicies promoted regarding God's word.

It must be easy if you have mastered it. :)

Oh man, you are fucked then. Sorry to hear that.

How do you objectively show someone is offensive?

You just admitted Hillary was correct when she called half of Trumps supporters deplorable. Good job

Your statement is useless unless you believe in every situation you can be right and inoffensive. Do you believe that? Because you aren't saying that.

You want us to look at a fake argument that the person made up?

Wow. You contradicted your first sentence with your second sentence. That's amazing.

"Liberal" is a simple, one word, label.

Kind of like using everything against liberals. That's a pretty simple view of the world.

Nothing else was actually an insult.

You call people dogmatist. That's your go to insult. If that's your idea of skillful at insults you have a lot to learn.

Captain obvious knows everything, but he never figured out my stance. How interesting. How can you claim that you tried to have a debate?

Just agree that it is always therapy even in the case of revolt.

You are a dogmatist that hates dogmatists. That's hypocrisy.

Your insult skills are awful in this debate.

Wow. What a strong insult. Too bad your insult skills aren't on par with your hypocrisy skills.

Admit that you agree with what I have said about the topic. I take that option.

And not typing the "obvious" explanations is dogmatic. Also, claiming that the answer is obvious is fallacious. So, you are objectively a bad debater, and you are a hypocrite. Congratulations.

Yes. Continue to provide no explanation. Continue to claim that your statements are true without justification. Continue to fit the definition of dogmatist perfectly.

"No, I'm just saying that it would be true for you that I'm a dogmatist, because it is useful for you to believe as it won't pain you by bursting your bubble of ignorance."

You stated this in response to me asking why my bubble would burst. Good job, dogmatist.

I did. You state things as fact without providing any reasons for it.

Look at the difference between you and me. You claim I didn't say something and I repeat what I said for you. You (a dogmatist) just go on saying your "facts".

The other parts of your message seem redundant.

It seems redundant because you still haven't addressed the fact that you didn't give your opinion from the beginning.