He didn't, he demonstrated an entirely different issue.
It's literally the same situation, just flipped. I don't know about you, but flipping situations is one of the best ways to gain perspective.
My point is that he dismissed the initial, larger issue in a way that undermined the severity of it.
I mean, you can interpret it however you want, but the fact is that he never explicitly dismissed the issue.
I have already explained how he did that: He literally dismissed the initial topic by deflecting to a different one.
Well your explanation is not a great one. If someone starts a debate about one group committing violence against another, it's pretty ridiculous to think the opposite won't or shouldn't be brought up.
I would gladly engage in an alternate discussion on his topic, but nice try.
Apparently not. The only thing you've done is insisted that it shouldn't be discussed since it's not as large of an issue (which is a fallacy by the way).
He drew attention from the issue brought up and onto a different issue.
So? A lot of insight can be gained by demonstrating that the problem is more complex than OP made it.
The initial issue brought up is larger, both proportionally and as a sum, than the one he brought up.
I'm not going to argue against that and he didn't either. What's your point exactly?
I have never dismissed police shootings. But he has dismissed the shootings of black Americans.
Show me where he did that.
This "One or the other" bullshit is completely nonsensical.
You're the one propagating that by shutting down any alternate discussions.
Oh wow. For some reason I thought he said Fahrenheit 451, and thought he was equating Bush to a Big Brother type figure, hahaha my mistake. Of course there is some truth to that too, but I'd say both liberals and conservatives are guilty of it.
This has to be a must-watch for you: http://www.youtube.com/
I was mostly joking, but okay. You didn't mention the dog was sleeping, only that it was lazy. Maybe the fox just wants the dog to get the dog in action to do something with his life. He could also be like one of those lazy homeless guys living off welfare; this could be the fox's way of getting him in the game.
I'm a pretty timid person (surprising I know), so its always been hard for me to get out of the so-called "friend zone", it really is an unfortunate place.
Really the only thing that has worked for me is to just completely be busy and cut off nearly all contact, without being a complete jerk. Girls can be drawn to those that seem to have a really busy lifestyle. Make sure you're doing activities that you really enjoy and are good at. Don't try to be someone you're not, that can backfire later, especially if it becomes the reason a girl is drawn to you.
That's just me though, everyone is different! :)
Why does it need a ceremony?
It doesn't really, its merely symbolism.
Why can't people just be together and be happy?And why does the government have to be involved for people to prove that they want to be together?
They can be. This just adds to it, as they are vowing to be together for the rest of their lives. This legal vow is harder to break and thus is thought of as an important commitment to someone. If you're truly happy together, there should be no fear of the difficulty of divorce anyway, which is the only reason I see for not having marriage.
Garry does love to do that. The thing I hate most is that in every argument he has to make some personal attack on either your intelligence or affiliations.
If he claims to be as smart or educated as he claims to be, he should realize that this only makes your argument less valid.
Sounds like you're cornered and you know it. So you're chickening out and pretending you don't have to prove anything to me.
Reality does not require proof. My perception is my reality. I don't need to prove what I think is real to you.
Never argued that.
Then what did you mean?
Nope. I did not assume any obligation of it.
Then why did you do it?
Again, never argued that. You seem to have a habit of assuming "always" out of my exceptions or discrimination's.
You seem to have a habit of not answering my questions.