Return to CreateDebate.comjaded • Join this debate community

Joe_Cavalry All Day Every Day


Winklepicker's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Winklepicker's arguments, looking across every debate.

I think there is a vast difference between an immigrant and an illegal immigrant.

Illegal means, contrary to, or forbidden by law.

Therefore, illegal immigrants are, by definition, criminals.

The same criminals which the Lord Mayor of New York has vowed to support and help to remain elusive to the duly appointed law enforcement officers.

America consists of immigrants and the descendents of immigrants .

People like Mrs, Trump, who submitted themselves to the nation's immigration regulations and procedures for consideration.

Not the illegal criminals who do not, and indeed cannot pay their just and lawful taxes as they must work anonymously in the black economy.

It's frightening that the Lord Mayor of the United States of America is giving succour to criminals.

You omitted one vital component of your incendiary list, that is a means by which to ignite the tinder.

I would say that eight years of political inertia combined with the disillusionment and arrogant disregard of America's overlooked white working classes was what torched the kindling.

The liberal elite seemed obsessed with concerns about America's downtrodden blacks, the innocent, law abiding and misunderstood Mexicans along with those of a deviant sexual orientation.

The Trump and Brexit victories are indications that the apathetic unheard sections of the western democracies have at last woken up and smelled what it is the 'progressives' have been shoveling.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
0 points

Naa, it's none of those, it's you the night before you have your annual shower.

Your stink would make a horse back away from it's nose bag.

I agree, a vote for Trump was a vote for the Lord God almighty himself.

Trump has been groomed by God to be a modern day disciple to further the Christian values on earth and to confront the forces of evil as represented by the demonic forces who worship false gods and the barbarity of their faiths.

May God continue to give him the endurance and strength he will need to complete his mammoth task of ridding the world of those who are doing the devil's work.

Hallelujah, sister, hallelujah may God be praised.

Where's the big deal, every school boy, and girl has been taught that for generations.

........................................................................................

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

The reference to the Holocaust was used exclusively to illustrate the bond between the mother and her child.

There undoubtedly are instances in nature when the off spring of certain species are raised collectively, but in the vast majority of cases they are brought up within a family group with the mother taking the main responsibility for the infant.

Try taking a lion or bear cub from their mother and see how quickly you would become mincemeat.

Even appear menacing towards the calf of a domesticated cow and it will attack you, as was the cause of two deaths in Northern Ireland within the past two weeks.

Many people labour under the misapprehension that evolution claims we evolved from monkeys/apes.

Evolution teaches us that human primates and nonhuman primates such as monkeys and chimpanzee's diverged from a common ancestor between 6 and 10 million years ago.

Although there is only a small difference between the D.N.A. of a human and a chimpanzee, I think as little as 1 or 2 %, I don't consider myself to have any ''monkey cousins''.

The are the ruthless rich and powerful and the intelligent rich and powerful.

The latter 'exploit' the lower orders and manipulate them so they behave in a manner which promotes the well being of their superior masters.

Don Quixote was used as an analogy to Ayn Rand as they both are academics with outlandish and fanciful notions.

In the case of Quixote he attacked windmills in the misguided notion that they were giants and Rand's equally ridiculous fantasy that children could, or should be separated and reared away from their natural parents.

Anyway, I think we've exhausted this line of discussion so I'll sign off here and wish you good luck.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

It wasn't a case of not watching the video, more that I was unable to log on to it.

I've just tried again, without success.

However, please note that I did respond to your thread as best as I could, as I usually do.

If you would prefer I didn't reply to your future posts please advise me and I'll accommodate your request.

Your proposals and references to Ayn Rand's works are indeed genuinely most interesting, but to my mind complicates what is quite a simple subject, let nature run it's course as intended and the outcome will be the best possible.

Throughout history mankind has always been a territorial/tribal animal and the concept of collectively raising children without their natural parents is really no more than a cruel fanciful notion.

Did you ever witness Jewish mothers trying to cling to their babies and children while the German guards beat them off by smashing their skulls with their rifle butts?

To deny children the love of their parents, the sort of love only parents can give would be inhuman.

To deny the parents the joy of rearing their family and guiding them through their vulnerable years would be a horrific thought, especially for the dubious purpose of satisfying the curiosity of some Don Quixote type academic.

People's territorial instincts can be observed in the unlikely settings of large offices.

For quite some time psychologists have argued that large open spaces with everyone, including managers all in the one zone without walled divisions would be conducive to promoting a team spirit and a more harmonious working environment.

Did it, do I hear you asking? Did it hell.

As soon as this ''experiment'' started people immediately began positioning filing cabinets and large plants around their desks in an effort of marking out their territory and in the process providing them with a degree of privacy.

The only way is nature's way.

I'm certainly not advocating killing anyone, or anything absolutely not. All I'm suggesting is let individuals and nations be left to their own devices to either sink or swim.

No helping hands, nature must rule supreme.

Thanks for your explanatory response.

I interpreted your initial remarks to be in agreement with my opinion on evolution and then felt you changed tack and became hostile towards my slant on the issue with comments tinged with a certain aloofness.

However, and with all due respect I feel I have made my position clear and therefore do not consider that there is any necessity for further clarification.

But, by way of exemplifying the thrust of my argument I would refer to the recent hurricanes in Haiti when the flimsy constructions were blown into the upper stratosphere, an occurrence which has been taking place once or twice each year for decades. Of course the Haitians immediately replaced their homes with constructions of corrugated iron and cardboard held together with chewing gum and elastic bands.

Were any lessons learned about the unsuitability of such buildings from their most recent traumatic experience as well as all the previous ones?;- naw, that would have involved thinking and holding reasoned debates about how best to prepare for the inevitability of future natural catastrophes .

Do these people, and those from similar backgrounds prepare for future hurricanes by establishing emergency stores of food, shelter and medical supplies ?;- naw, let the U.N. and the Yanks do that.

Would such people still exist if it wasn't for them being kept alive artificially?

I don't think so.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Actually, that's exactly what I am saying, whilst trying to be as politically correct as I can with such a realistically harsh message, and I make no apology whatsoever for doing so.

Every now and then some people will hit hard times and the strong and capable will provide a temporary safety net for such occurrences.

However, those people who, perhaps through geographical isolation or religious dogma, have missed out on the distribution of superior genes will need to be fed and cared for indefinitely.

We can witness this ''inferiority'' in numerous countries where the inhabitants require to be provided with food, shelter and medical care for generation after generation.

They never learn from their experiences of disasters nor are they capable of reasoning and understanding the world in which they live and what makes it tick, and they never will.

The learning process and survival instincts can be observed in animals such as the lowly wildebeest as they cross great distances to reach the rich grazing lands which they need for survival.

Many of the lower orders of mankind cannot even make this fundamental observation that radical decisions, such as moving on will be necessary to survive.

They have come to expect handouts as their God given right and become indignant if the bounty which is being provided by the hardworking ''superior'' taxpayers of the world is, in their opinion, too slow in coming.

They should be left to perish so the earth's finite resources can be utilized to support the proliferation of superior humankind just as nature intended.

Your idea of evolution is, through ignorance and your inability to interpret the available information correctly, completely cockeyed.

It is difficult to dispel deep seated ignorance in one fell swoop, but do try to read and comprehend what most people already know about evolution.

Evolution is the process of natural selection.

More individuals are produced each generation that can survive.

Phenotypic variation exists among individuals and the variation is heritable.

Those individuals with traits better suited to the environment in which they live will survive.

The evolutionary process of elimination of the weak, less suited to survive in a changing world, either physically or intellectually, is played out over millions of years. Just as neanderthal man was replaced by modern humankind.

In the animal world subtle changes occur within all species and those where the evolutionary ''modifications'' are superior to the original design will, in the fullness of time reign supreme.

In mankind it is the intelligent, talented and capable who are at the top ''food chain'', figuratively speaking.

In time the genetically superior humans will become dominant and eventually completely replace the lower orders, again as was the case of the slower thinking less able neanderthal man was eclipsed by modern humankind.

Today we see those intelligent, forward thinking people at the top of the tree enjoying what appears to the intellectually challenged, an unfair and privileged lifestyle.

Whilst these ''superior'' people command their lofty positions within the 'pecking order'' of life they will also have had the foresight to make provision for their twilight years and have contingencies in place for the eventuality of any unforeseen disasters.

As a result of their prudence they will be able to draw on sufficient funds in their senior years to ensure that those on the lower rungs of the ladder work slavishly to keep them in the manner to which they have, through merit and their ''natural'' superiority , become accustomed.

Feeding the lower orders who are incapable of providing for themselves is a costly and futile exercise.

Keeping any species alive artificially is flouting one of nature's fundamental laws, ''survival of the fittest''.

Nature's''natural selection'' is why the vast array of species have evolved into their present day successful state.

The weak and incapable are meant to become extinct so that the earth's finite resources can continue to support the evolution of the superior classes.

Government's don't keep the useless layabouts alive, the successful, hard working taxpayers do.

Very true. That sound advice of course includes human beings such as the hapless African Bongos, the equally hapless Haitians and the so called Muslim refugees who head towards Europe in endless droves reminiscent the great herds of wildebeest sweeping across the Serengeti planes as they migrate in search of the lush grazing pastures.

If gnus can look after themselves, how come Bongos and Muslims rely on Europe and white Americans?

But, what if you're caged with a randy homosexual gorilla with an insatiable sexual appetite?

Don't make the obvious reply.

They're too clever, too hard working and too self reliant.

Like China is doing now, they adopted the west's manufacturing and marketing techniques and beat us, temporarily, at our own game.

Fortunately we are more innovative and with people like Bill Gates around we can stay ahead of the posse'.

When things settle down and a level playing field is established, WE'LL BE BACK''.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
3 points

Such irrational zealots have been brainwashed many years ago and regardless of what reasoned counter argument you present they will simply quote the fanciful notions of the well meaning academics of their day who tried in their state of ignorance to explain the mysteries of the universe in a 2000 year old book called the Bible, or the Koran, or whatever.

Let's take a close look at the Biblical account of the beginning of earth and mankind.

One day when God was zooming around the Cosmos he thought, I must build another world. I mean I only have a trillion zillion at the moment.

So wallop, bang, zap and behold the world exists.

Then he decides he would like a nice garden with pretty flowers and fragrant foliage. Kapow, the garden is there.

While twiddling his thumbs one wet afternoon he come up with the idea of making a man, maybe just out of boredom.

Yes, you're correct, along came Adam.

Adam appeared in the garden around 40 years of age.

He didn't wonder, what the hell am I doing here?

From where did I come?

No he just wandered happily and contentedly eating the lush fruit and enjoying the sunshine.

God noticed Adam's state of contentment and thought, emm, I'll soon put an end to this.

Yep, you got it again, he sneaked down one night under cover of darkness and stole one of Adam's ribs from which he made Eve, the first woman.

Like Adam, Eve didn't ask where she came from, nor did Adam seem slightly curious who the hell this strange person with two pointy things on their chest and no penis or testicles was.

God then visited Eve and told her she could eat from the fruit of any tree she wanted except for one, the apple tree which he, very foolishly pointed out to her.

When God sped off for a quick burn up around the universe a snake appeared and told Eve it was okay to eat the fruit from the apple tree.

As soon as she did she became ashamed of certain parts of her anatomy, very peculiar.

Now, I don't know about you but when I see a snake I back off, if it starts talking to me I crap myself whilst running a 100 M.P.H.

This is the book upon which people swear in a court of law to tell the truth and nothing but the truth.

I rest my case.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
4 points

Opps, that was meant to be a clear response and not a dispute.

Hope I won't have to go to jail.

He didn't quite say that, he said he would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the full illegality of her criminal negligence and willful destroying evidence of the crime.

I guess that's would be her going to jail, just the same as we all would had we been caught as she was.

Her treatment along with the absence of any prosecution epitomizes the old adage;- it's not what you know, it's who you know.

Well yes, and it also highlighted that there are no flies on Big Don.

Did you hear about the Irish fly that landed on Dolly Parton's arm?

Most of these children will grow up resenting all those involved in their brainwashing.

Such psychologically disturbing indoctrination of minors before they can make a reasoned and mature assessment of all the religious hocus pocus should be made a criminal offence.

Actually on a second viewing of the tape I'm quite sure ''the shadow'' is really the blurred image of a second person, probably the pillion passenger, ( a British term ) who is comforted by one of the uniformed men who puts his arm around his/her shoulder.

Boringly, there's always a scientific explanation for most cases of apparent paranormal phenomena.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

My computer crashed, could you type that again please, thank you.

''Our acts our angels are,

for good or ill,

our fatal shadows that walk by us still''.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

No, sorry, all I get is;-- Couldn't load plugin.................................

When the beauty of the female form is captured and, perhaps enhanced, on canvas it is indeed a true glory to behold.

Of course there are sexual overtones, but a tasteful painting of ''the nude'' is in stark contrast to the heaving, sweating bodies of actors and actresses feigning various acts of depraved sexual activity.

I don't really object to these things going on, but I want in on them.

Ah, but you don't know that as you've never seen a bullfrog with wings hopping, therefore your assumption cannot be described as an indisputable and absolute truth.

Just in the same way if I said you could shit coal-bricks if your arsehole was square, wouldn't necessarily be true either as I've never observed you having a shit, thank God.

You know you are alive therefore it would be true to say, at the time of ''going to press'', you are a living creature.

As the French philosopher Rene' Descartes said;- Cogito Ergo Sum, translated means ''I think, therefore I am''.

Or my version, I think therefore I am, I think.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Spot the paradox. ''There is no such thing as an absolute truth''.

If that were so then the statement itself would be an absolute truth and therefore self contradictory.

I didn't read it either because it's an oxymoron.

The title is a self confessed contradiction in terms, so why bother to read it?

A truth, scientific or otherwise, is a truth and cannot by definition be a falsehood.

An alleged truth or a perceived truth is not a truth, and that's the truth.

I wonder if she would take a bad price for her coat?

I think she may have appropriated that garment from the props of ''Joseph and his amazing technicolor dreamcoat''.

We can tell that she doesn't want to noticed and is playing a low profile by wearing her 'quiet coat'.

Good old Hillary, just a subtle as a kick in the balls.

Yeah, let's fight to maintain the true American traditions.

1) Cops eat doughnuts and shoot people.

2) Democrats ruin the economy and the Republicans sort out their fiscal mess.

3) Blacks wreck the place.

4) Official American foreign policy;- Bomb the bastards.

Oh dear, that's awkward for me.

You see I'm a real dirty rotten scoundrel, and there I go calling myself names.

Well, I suppose you gotta do what a censor's gotta do.

Maybe they're all one of the same.

Alien the God, Alien the Son and Alien the Holy Ghost, and of course all the Alien Angles.

Now there's an epic blockbuster for you, pity Charlton Heston wasn't around to act in the starring role.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

It's currently with the Public Prosecutor's Department.

However, as I don't like to brag nor vainly demonstrate my notoriety I must decline your request.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

You have now been officially removed from my enemy list and joined up with the rest of my enemies floating around helplessly in cyberspace.

I have no allies, no hostiles nor any enemies. Surely someone must hate me, I mean, I'm a real 1st class dirty, double dealing, lowdown scoundrel, and I have a certificate to prove it.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Well, don't knock being classified as an enemy, Jesus said, 'Love thine enemies, he didn't say anything about friends.

I'll give that a shot and see what happens.

Would a quiet snigger suffice?

I hate roars of horrible forced laughter from a theatre's back stalls, it drowns out all the people with bronchitis who only went to cough.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Please refer to your message box.

I think it would be best to have things sorted but I cannot see where to rectify this mistake.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Believe me, I'm as confused as you are. It certainly wasn't of my doing.

I like your arguments/debates along with your off beat sense of humour and have always done so.

I'll go right now and see if my limited computer skills will permit me to modify whatever glitch the little mischievous gremlin has created.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

Yeah, along with some text;- Don't photobomb me, this is going up as my ''Selfie Sunday''.

Hey, I have big feet, I mean I have my shoes made at Harland & Wolff's shipyard, and I have been successful at multiplying the human species for decades. The secret to having a successful, ''KNEE WOBBLER' is to have a chopper bigger than your feet.

As for water sports, well in Belfast Lough you don't really water ski, you just go through the 'motions'.

I was going to read that account of the continuation of miracles but as I was in a rush I just read War and Peace instead so I wasn't late for my appointment. It was about Russia by the way.

It's difficult to do both. I mean do you really expect Sir Gallant Knight in Shining armour to be whacking dragons and deflecting bullets whilst scrubbing shit which has hardened like reinforced structural concrete from the the lavatory bowl?

How come they demonstrated with such a pathetically small replication? That is an insult to manhood the world over!! If it is real, then either gangrene has set in to that pitiful specimen or there must be a Pygmy somewhere searching frantically for the b'tard who castrated him. Throughout history student demonstrations have never achieved anything nor influenced the course of history. Did they ever stop to think that if personal protection weapons were issued to a number of their well vetted school pals they would have a greater chance of surviving a gun attack, or even avoiding one? These so called ''crazy'' murderers are seldom, if ever sufficiently ''crazy'' to attack anyone or any group which is able to defend themselves.

Well, with such a restricted choice, and considering the merits of the candidates I think I'll have to go for Coke. Yes sirree Bob, if you want to turn America around;- vote Coke.

Must by mentally defective. All other sane, self respecting politicians in a pose as the first photo would have made certain that their tonsils were airbrushed before releasing for promotional purposes. Must be a complete nutcase. If all else fails she could always give soprano singing recitals in her looney bin.

He has openly declared his commitment to face up to and address the main issues which are causing Americans the most concern as they watch the might of their once great nation being eroded by the contamination of unrestricted immigration and the failure to confront the ''black problem''. Unlike other ethnic minorities Blacks have demonstrated, over a long period of time that they, generally speaking, lack the necessary self discipline to engage in, and excel in formal education. Their executive skills and entrepreneurial abilities are virtually non existent leading to a state of affairs whereby they wander the streets aimlessly and inevitably become involved in crime, usually of a violent nature and drug dealing. They have been encouraged to believe that their plight is all the fault of the big bad white man while failing to notice that other non-whites such as Asians and Jews prosper as they engage in the 'American Dream'', which still exists for those industrious people who do not possess a sense of unwarranted resentfulness and merge in with the society in which they live. Trump has the political courage to stand up and state these self evident truths and try to have the Blacks recognize the fact that the answer to their self-imposed woeful state is in their own hands. The United States can only provide the laws and environment for the Black man to succeed in life but it appears that laziness and crime is a congenital characteristic of their psyche'. But nevertheless, unlike his yellow bellied low life political opponents who have kicked this ''race tin'' up the road for generations, Trump is prepared to tackle the Black problem head on. Clearly appeasement hasn't worked with the Blacks and someone is going to have to do something radical to resolve the present state of political inertia before America vanishes up it's own arsehole.

Because it's difficult for a Deity which is no more than the figment of a paedophile's crazed imagination to do anything. The fact that millions of hysterical people, mainly sweaty Arabs worship this fictional character doesn't make him/her any more real than all the other man made Gods. This question could also include, why do millions of so called Muslim refugees have to travel through oil rich Islamic States to seek solace in the countries of Christendom. Even the thickest Muslims with their illusory God must wonder why Allah expects the, equally imaginary Christian God to do his dirty work.

The only thing I object to with breastfeeding in public is the baby. It spoils what would otherwise be a beautiful view.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

In my opinion the support of any terrorist organization is wrong as all such groups will, to a greater of lesser extent, and sooner or later commit atrocities against innocent civilians. They usually try to defend their barbaric human slaughter by rationalizing that the means justifies the end. Those who enter the 'gates of hell' into terrorism soon become dehumanized and lose all sense of human decency. Terrorism shouldn't be confused with popular mass uprising by a repressed people such as we see in North Korea. When terrorist groups form within sections of a community and try to impose their political doctrine on the rest of that society you can be pretty sure that another terrorist group will be spawned to counter the ideologies of the first. This scenario, whereby the main losers are civilians, can be observed in many of the Muslim states of the near and Middle East.

Your assertion may possibly be a debatable option for some repressive totalitarian regimes, but in countries which have a democratic political system terrorism has absolutely no place whatsoever. In democratic societies the ''armalite'', figuratively speaking, has long since been replaced by the ballot box. The western powers only use military force, including drones, to fight against ruthless insurgents such as I.S, and never, willfully against civilians. Almost without exception, the present conflicts in the world occur in dictatorships.

Yes, in their 10's of 1000's. Americans donated many millions of dollars to the I.R.A, through ''Noraid''. The I.R.A, were nothing more than a group of psychopathic murderers who butchered innocent men, women and children in their crazed attempt to achieve their political objectives. The millions of dollars American's donated to this vicious bunch of criminals was used to buy arms and Semtex explosives from such low lives as Colonial Qaddafi and was used to kill civilians and members of the legitimate security forces. American dollars also helped towards the destruction of Northern Ireland's industrial and commercial base which has still not recovered. Hope that answered your question.

I knew plenty of people who lived until they died..........

Well, if there is a God and he created us, then he must have an enormous sense of humour, a sort of warped sick sense of humour. He and all his board members must spend a lot of time rolling on the floor with laughter watching our wars as we annihilate each other and continue to develop the means to make the killing process more efficient. God and all his right hand men probably have bets on the date we eventually destroy our planet along with ourselves and all other living creatures.

An over simplistic statement and glib dismissal of what the British nation will have to suffer as a consequence of Brexit. The fools who headed the Brexit campaign didn't really expect to win and have now jumped ship to avoid the inevitable fallout from their surprise success. Every financial institution, from the Bank of England to the head of the I.M.F, have all expressed their deep concern for the economy of the U.K. But, it's good to note that you know better. Maybe you would provide the us all with your post Brexit economic plan upon which you arrived at your conclusion that, ''their economy will fine''.

Despite the yearning from the ''leave'' camp, S.S, European Union hasn't sank and with the might of the German economy and it's industrial power along with their total commitment to it's continuance there is little likelihood of that happening. On the other hand H.M.S. United Kingdom has been holed by the Euro referendum Iceberg and is taking in water. Easy-jet have made a statement that they are definitely moving their H.Q, to mainland Europe with the loss of 1000 U,.K., jobs at Luton. Richard Branson's latest enterprise which was programmed to be established in the U.K, will now go to Europe and employ over 3000. The banking giant Morgan Stanley are moving out of the City of London and transferring their operations to Dublin where they'll employ 2000 members of staff and a further branch in mainland Europe. Standard Life have suspended trading in U.K, property funds blaming ''exceptional market circumstances following the E.U. referendum result''. These facts are only statistics providing you're not the one of those who will lose their job. As the days and weeks unfold there will be more horror stories to report as the U.K, economy ''sinks'' into recession with massive job losses. Boris the Buffoon jumped the sinking ship from which he pulled the plug and then stated today that the government should list out ''how Brexit could help the British economy''. He was one of the senior shitheads who supported Brexit so why doesn't he tell us what the economic advantages are? He makes the mess than shouts for others to provide evidence of how to get out of the quagmire which he and others created. Do you know any? Having helped to torpedo H.M.S. United Kingdom Nigel Farage like the proverbial rats has also jumped ship. Where is the great Brexit plan for the U.K, economy? On what economic, commercial and industrial strategy did the Brexit morons base their brilliant plan? The dummies, such as you who listened to the emotional subjective gobbledygook from the egotistical neanderthals like Farage and Boris the Buffoon have left you lot , and us with their mess. In true professional and positive style George Osborne stated today that we must go forward and shouldn't look back in anger. By Christ almighty it is a very tall order not to view the Brexit filth with anything other than utter contempt.

Please refer to my points as shown above. Of course the 'money sponge' which is Brussels needs to be expunged of the rogues and scoundrels who go to make up the biggest Mafioso family in the world. Most definitely the much needed reforms should return more sovereignty and national decision making, especially on the main issue of immigration to the member states. The U.K, could easily and legally have blocked any move to form a European military force, which without the inclusion of the United States would nothing more than a very expensive paper tiger. As the E. U, have never closed their books, i.e, permitted an independent company of chartered accountants audit their books there is little chance of this gang of filth ever forming a treasury as any such institution would have to be subject to inspection. But the truth is that these reforms could have been achieved from within, thus avoiding the trauma to the U.K., economy and the inevitable growing poverty of Britain's working class population. A constant expose' of the skulduggery of the unelected gangsters in Brussels along with weekly/daily, peaceful, well organized and orchestrated demonstrations would have seen the whole phony house of cards come tumbling down when it could have been replaced with a modified and democratic administration.

When making such an enormous and far reaching decision there is no room for prejudices or emotions. An objective, debit vs credit assessment must be made of such an issue and, using this format it is difficult, if not impossible to see how any decision other than ''remain'' could have been reached. The E.U, needs urgent reforms and the gangsters in pin stripped suits must be made accountable to the electorate of the member states. This along with the ''open door policy'' of UNCONTROLLED immigration has turned what started out to be a free trade zone into an unmanageable circus and an economic disaster. However, all these frustrations could have been dealt with more effectively from within this corrupt organization of self serving, Chateau Lafite sipping, foie gras guzzling bureaucrats. The negotiating skills of the U.K's politicians and the mental agility of their civil servants will be put to their greatest test since WW2 in the forthcoming negotiations.

As the the Exodus of major corporations has already started and momentum expected to gain pace over the forthcoming months it will be the ''brainless'' common people who will suffer most. The rich, clever wealth and job creators won't be affected as they will simply move the centre of their operations to mainland Europe. By far and away the biggest issue which won the day for ''leave campaigners was ''mass UNCONTROLLED immigration, but as the E.U, Mafia have made it abundantly clear, that there will be no negotiating on the ''open border'' policy, the U.K., is going to end up with the worst of all worlds. If the U.K, wish to continue enjoying a tariff free trading arrangement with the E.U,( which they absolutely need) they are going to have to accept the immigration quotas dictated by Brussels along with other, hard to digest conditions, but will have no say in the policies which will affect the U.K. Brexit was a mistake of colossus proportions and will have a dreadful impact on the prosperity of the British people. The referendum should never have been called and as time elapses the true damage will become more apparent. The migration of companies= fewer jobs, less inward investment= fewer jobs, fewer companies and jobs= less tax revenue= fewer public services and social benefits. So, the common people with mad dog's shit for brains have gone and committed financial suicide and condemned future generations to a significantly reduced standard of living. Well done the common people, you've really gone and done it now.

Wrong, that sounds more like an article by some journalist trying to fill a column in their employer's newspaper. The overwhelming, not the exclusive, but the overwhelming reason why the people of the United Kingdom took the enormous risk of being left outside the biggest single market in the world and voted for so called Brexit was ''uncontrolled'' immigration. With a population of 65million the influx of over 500,000 immigrants every year has pushed the public services of the United Kingdom beyond breaking point. Teachers having to teach two to five different nationalities in one class, the national health service is just short of collapse with ''economic immigrants'' and health service tourists along with the immigrant demand for free housing and unemployment benefits has turned an unbearable situation into a full blown crisis. As Nigel Farage told the members of the European Parliament;- the E.U, is a political institution in denial. The Euro currency is doomed to fail and the runaway budget and membership requirements of Brussels is bankrupting some nations such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and even France going against all the original E.U, fiscal rules and running a massive budget deficit. The loss of sovereignty and control of one's own borders was another humiliation which the majority of the U.K's population decided was not worth the apparent benefits of being a member of this backward sliding organization. The Brussels Mafiosa, ( the E.U.Parliament ) have never made their books available for audit and are unashamedly unable/unwilling to explain numerous unaccountable sums of money which literally add up to many billions of Euros.

I'm glad you agree with me on the dangers of pens. As the old adage goes, the pen is mightier than the sword, and we must recognise that it has the added advantage of being easier to write with. Thanks for your advice on the anger management classes. I might just have a 'stab' at those.

If you smoke a pipe as my dad does, but which I don't, a pocket knife is a most useful tool for reaming out the buildup of carbon inside the bowl and the needle like extension is invaluable to clear tobacco beads blocking the stem. If someone is intent on causing bodily harm then an apparently innocent looking ball pen, preferably metal, expertly used with a thrust into an eye socket or to the temple of the head can be just as lethal. Should pens be banned?

Atheists do have a belief. They believe there is no god..............

I think it is primarily a case of, the more the facts about the shocking barbarity of this backward and demonic religion is revealed the more they commit murder in a cowardly attempt to stop the awful truth becoming widespread knowledge.

Ban the bum or ban the gun? I think banning trying to ban the bum would be a futile exercise whereas banning the gun could only achieve limited success. So, making a choice would be meaningless.

So, for instance, all that would have been necessary was to tell Hitler that he was wrong and an idiot. What a lot of death and destruction that approach would have avoided. If only someone had thought of that 70 odd years ago.

In a couple words, they breathe. ........................................

Yes, he's the catalyst against which most ''middle Americans'' are reacting. His policies have resulted in the United States losing control of it's borders and the unprecedented influx of illegal immigrants many of whom are violent drug dealing Mexican gangsters. In my opinion Trump is not Presidential material but his indisputable success illustrates the frustration and grave concerns at what Obama has done to their country.

This is a red herring put about by mischievous conspiracy theorists. Everyone knows it was Roger Rabbit.

Yes, and in a democracy we're carrying the hand basket ourselves. A difficult feat, but we've been doing it for quite sometime.

-1 points

Your sanctimonious drivel doesn't invalidate any of the facts I have catalogued for the do-gooder's club of which you must be the chairman. You see, what I am doing here, and on other posts is to wind up you bunch of bleeding heart dummies. How you holier-than thou naive children love to champion the cause of those whom you perceive as the under dogs and wallow in the smugness of your own self-righteousness whilst bellowing your feigned outrage and indignation at someone who appears to think differently to you. Hey, look at me, ain't I one of those broad minded good guys who spreads love and harmony throughout the world, man, man oh man, how sick can people become? I don't think blacks are any better or any worse than anyone else, but it gives me satisfaction to note how life's non achievers jump at the opportunity to sound off and clamber up to what they perceive as the moral high ground. Like naive little children trying to endear themselves to teacher, 'what a good boy am I''. Very good Johnny, come up and get your apple from my desk. Wowee, how eye-watering and embarrassingly pathetic you lot are. But, on the other side of the coin, if it weren't for dumb weirdos like you, how would I get a laugh? Keep it up, it's genuinely hilarious and tremendously entertaining.''Roars of laughter from the back stalls''.

Winklepicker(1021) Clarified
1 point

You don't have to test them all. Judge them by their past and present achievements and their ability to compete and succeed in the modern world. The results of this form of assessment will be vividly self explanatory.

-2 points

If your misguided assertion were true it would belie the stark facts. Try to set your academic drivel to the one side for the moment and consider the following objectively, if you are capable of doing that. White people have made almost every invention/discovery which has contributed to the advancement and welfare of mankind. These include the computer you're using, the internet, the language by which your gobbledygook is expressed, the internal combustion engine, the diesel engine, the automobile, commercial vehicles, ( by which the west delivers the food and supplies to the ''begging bowls'' of the black Africans because they haven't figured out after countless centuries that crops don't grow in the sandy deserts of the world, the jet engine, the aeroplane, the helicopter, space going rockets, space exploration, television, radio, radar, X-ray, visual aids, i.e, binoculars/telescope, spectacles, ocean going liners, the submarine, the petro-chemical industry, i.e, energy fuels and plastics, electricity, the light bulb, laser technology, high yield farming techniques, modern building techniques and materials, penicillin, almost all of the world's full range of life saving and pain relieving drugs, ( for which the dumb black African nations rely on to help stem their illnesses), the ball pen, the fountain pen, modern food processing procedures. The extent of the white man's ingenuity is boundless. Where are the Black man's major, job/wealth creating corporations? where are the black man's international banks and financial institutions? Where are those blacks with the executive abilities to form cohesive governments which can provide all the social requirements, such as medical care, social housing, education, vocational training, defense and so forth? Certainly not in Africa, and certainly not in the black run city council of Detroit. All your pretentious use of ''big words', straight from your handy thesauruses along with quotes from the internet,cannot twist or alter the glaring truth, which is, the plain facts graphically illustrate that blacks are of a sub-order whose brain development ceased to evolve many centuries ago. To summarize, blacks suffer from an arrested intellect, laziness, a congenital aversion to disciplined formal education, a lack of ingenuity and enterprise, with a bubbling enthusiasm for violent crime and insurrection. The worrying part? They infest the west in their whinging millions and blame their ''condition'' on 'the big bad white man''.

A lot of the benefits to which this brace of fast talking actors referred have already been eroded since this video was made. Somewhere along the line a generation dropped the baton of the nation's advancement and the good old U.S.A, is now on the slippery slope. Alas, mass unregulated immigration, welfareism and liberalism has taken it's toll. Did actors in those days not have to breathe between lines?

Having discovered the secret of time travel I regularly experience this time phenomena.

That depends on who's laughing, what they're laughing at and your mood at the time. If you're in a reflective mood enjoying a quiet moment in your favorite, 'bolt hole' cafe and some loud mouth starts a session of deafening forced laughter, then it's just a pain. Some people have a contagious belly laugh which can have others laughing without knowing what they'r laughing at.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]